Literature DB >> 24244103

Biological Sex Determines Whether Faces Look Real.

Benjamin Balas1.   

Abstract

Judging whether a face is real or artificial can be done relatively rapidly and accurately, even when visual information is substantially impoverished. The perception of animacy in the face also has several interesting properties that may reflect both the underlying "tuning" of face space to preferentially represent real face appearance and the diagnosticity of individual features for categorizing faces as animate or inanimate. In the current study, we examined how sex categories interact with animacy perception by separately characterizing animacy judgments as a function of stimulus sex. We find that stimulus sex affects subjective ratings of animacy and sex categorization of real and artificial faces. Specifically, female faces look more artificial and artificial faces look more female. We discuss our results in terms of the ecology of real and artificial faces and the possible role of visual experience with artificial female faces, and the objectification of female faces.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animacy Perception; Face perception; Gender Classification; Sex effects

Year:  2013        PMID: 24244103      PMCID: PMC3828291          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.823138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  35 in total

1.  The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification.

Authors:  A J O'Toole; K A Deffenbacher; D Valentin; K McKee; D Huff; H Abdi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

2.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

3.  I think I know that face...

Authors:  P Sinha; T Poggio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-12-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  You can take the eyes out of the doll, but....

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Joseph Horski
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Race is gendered: how covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization.

Authors:  Kerri L Johnson; Jonathan B Freeman; Kristin Pauker
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-08-29

6.  The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sex, beauty, and the relative luminance of facial features.

Authors:  Richard Russell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  The role of face shape and pigmentation in other-race face perception: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Perception isn't so simple: commentary on Bernard, Gervais, Allen, Campomizzi, and Klein (2012).

Authors:  Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-18

10.  Chimpanzee faces are 'special' to humans.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  4 in total

1.  Artificial faces are harder to remember.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Jonathan Pacella
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2015-11-01

2.  Rapid Facial Reactions in Response to Facial Expressions of Emotion Displayed by Real Versus Virtual Faces.

Authors:  Leonor Philip; Jean-Claude Martin; Céline Clavel
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-07-12

3.  Perceiving Animacy in Own-and Other-Species Faces.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Amanda Auen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-23

4.  What is So Special About Contemporary CG Faces? Semiotics of MetaHumans.

Authors:  Gianmarco Thierry Giuliana
Journal:  Topoi (Dordr)       Date:  2022-08-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.