Literature DB >> 14651322

Sex, beauty, and the relative luminance of facial features.

Richard Russell1.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the consistent luminance difference between the darker regions of the eyes and mouth and the lighter regions that surround them forms a pattern unique to faces. One of the more consistent uses of cosmetics to make the female face more attractive is to darken the eyes and mouth relative to the surrounding skin. The hypothesis that the size of the luminance difference between the eyes and mouth and the rest of the face affects the attractiveness of male and female faces differently was tested in four experiments in which attractiveness ratings were obtained for images of faces in which the luminance difference between the eyes and mouth and the rest of the face had been manipulated. Female faces were found to be more attractive when this luminance difference was increased than when it was decreased, and the opposite was found for male faces. An interpretation consistent with these results is that the luminance difference between the eyes and mouth and the rest of the face is naturally greater in women than men. In this case increasing or decreasing the luminance difference will make a face more feminine or masculine, respectively, and hence, more or less attractive depending on the sex of the face. Implications for the causes of cosmetics usage are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14651322     DOI: 10.1068/p5101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  31 in total

1.  Shape, color and the other-race effect in the infant brain.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Alissa Westerlund; Katherine Hung; Charles A Nelson Iii
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-04-04

2.  Face perception: A brief journey through recent discoveries and current directions.

Authors:  Ipek Oruc; Benjamin Balas; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Human colour in mate choice and competition.

Authors:  Hannah M Rowland; Robert P Burriss
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Species-specific effects of pigmentation negation on the neural response to faces.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Kate Stevenson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Children (but not adults) judge similarity in own- and other-race faces by the color of their skin.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Jessie Peissig; Margaret Moulson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-10-21

6.  The role of face shape and pigmentation in other-race face perception: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Facial Cosmetics Exert a Greater Influence on Processing of the Mouth Relative to the Eyes: Evidence from the N170 Event-Related Potential Component.

Authors:  Hideaki Tanaka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-05

8.  Asymmetries in infants' attention toward and categorization of male faces: The potential role of experience.

Authors:  Jennifer L Rennels; Andrea J Kayl; Judith H Langlois; Rachel E Davis; Mateusz Orlewicz
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2015-11-06

9.  Biological Sex Determines Whether Faces Look Real.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013

10.  Facial Skin Coloration Affects Perceived Health of Human Faces.

Authors:  Ian D Stephen; Miriam J Law Smith; Michael R Stirrat; David I Perrett
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.