Literature DB >> 19485131

Chimpanzee faces are 'special' to humans.

Jessica Taubert1.   

Abstract

A longstanding proposal is that primates, including humans, might have an innate representation of face structure. But, if humans have such a representation, how broad is its form: limited to coding conspecifics, or general enough to cover related species? The results reported here show adult humans process faces of chimpanzees in a way previously assumed to be exclusive to human faces. The composite effect was used to provide the first direct test of so-called holistic processing. Despite no lifetime experience of chimpanzees, adult humans showed a substantial composite effect for chimpanzee faces, and also an inversion effect. There was no similar evidence of holistic processing for faces of species of greater phylogenic distance from humans, including gorillas, spider monkeys, sheep, chickens, and Jacky lizards; nor was there any effect for non-face objects. In contrast to the holistic processing results, discrimination of chimpanzee faces was, as expected, poor. In the context of evidence that poor discrimination of heterospecific faces arises from a process of perceptual narrowing in infancy, our results suggest that adults retain some aspects of a broader bandwidth present in neonates (holistic processing) but lose others (discrimination).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19485131     DOI: 10.1068/p6254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  13 in total

1.  Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus) extends to familiar humans.

Authors:  Leanne Proops; Karen McComb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Visual configural processing in adults born at extremely low birth weight.

Authors:  Karen J Mathewson; Daphne Maurer; Catherine J Mondloch; Saroj Saigal; Ryan J Van Lieshout; Louis A Schmidt
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2019-08-27

3.  Species-specific effects of pigmentation negation on the neural response to faces.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Kate Stevenson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  The evolution of face processing in primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Artificial faces are harder to remember.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Jonathan Pacella
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2015-11-01

6.  Visual expertise does not predict the composite effect across species: a comparison between spider (Ateles geoffroyi) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Children's neural response to contrast-negated faces is species specific.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Kate Stevenson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-12-03

8.  Biological Sex Determines Whether Faces Look Real.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013

9.  The complete design in the composite face paradigm: role of response bias, target certainty, and feedback.

Authors:  Günter Meinhardt; Bozana Meinhardt-Injac; Malte Persike
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The Impact of Face Inversion on Animacy Categorization.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Amanda Auen; Alyson Saville
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.