Literature DB >> 21123266

The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.

Lisa A Parr1, Jessica Taubert.   

Abstract

Understanding how individual identity is processed from faces remains a complex problem. Contrast reversal, showing faces in photographic negative, impairs face recognition in humans and demonstrates the importance of surface-based information (shading and pigmentation) in face recognition. We tested the importance of contrast information for face encoding in chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys using a computerized face-matching task. Results showed that contrast reversal (positive to negative) selectively impaired face processing in these two species, although the impairment was greater for chimpanzees. Unlike chimpanzees, however, monkeys performed just as well matching negative to positive faces, suggesting that they retained some ability to extract identity information from negative faces. A control task showed that chimpanzees, but not rhesus monkeys, performed significantly better matching face parts compared with whole faces after a contrast reversal, suggesting that contrast reversal acts selectively on face processing, rather than general visual-processing mechanisms. These results confirm the importance of surface-based cues for face processing in chimpanzees and humans, while the results were less salient for rhesus monkeys. These findings make a significant contribution to understanding the evolution of cognitive specializations for face processing among primates, and suggest potential differences between monkeys and apes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21123266      PMCID: PMC3107657          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  40 in total

1.  Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives.

Authors:  G J Hole; P A George; V Dunsmore
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex.

Authors:  D I Perrett; J K Hietanen; M W Oram; P J Benson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Shape from shadows.

Authors:  P Cavanagh; Y G Leclerc
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Face recognition with multi-tone and two-tone photographic negatives.

Authors:  C H Liu; A Chaudhuri
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  The Thatcher illusion as a test of configural disruption.

Authors:  M B Lewis; R A Johnston
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  L A Parr; J T Winslow; W D Hopkins; F B de Waal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance.

Authors:  G Rhodes
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition.

Authors:  Katalin M Gothard; Kelly N Brooks; Mary A Peterson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces.

Authors:  Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Annum A Qureshi; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Species-specific effects of pigmentation negation on the neural response to faces.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Kate Stevenson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Aagten-Murphy; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The organization of conspecific face space in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Jessica Taubert; Anthony C Little; Peter J B Hancock
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Biological Sex Determines Whether Faces Look Real.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013

6.  Evolution of facial color pattern complexity in lemurs.

Authors:  Hanitriniaina Rakotonirina; Peter M Kappeler; Claudia Fichtel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Intranasal oxytocin selectively modulates the behavior of rhesus monkeys in an expression matching task.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Molly Flessert; Ning Liu; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.