Literature DB >> 20048269

Systematic review: prediction of perioperative cardiac complications and mortality by the revised cardiac risk index.

Meredith K Ford1, W Scott Beattie, Duminda N Wijeysundera.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) is widely used to predict perioperative cardiac complications.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the RCRI to predict cardiac complications and death after noncardiac surgery. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science (1966 to 31 December 2008). STUDY SELECTION: Cohort studies that reported the association of the RCRI with major cardiac complications (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and nonfatal cardiac arrest) or death in the hospital or within 30 days of surgery. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics, documented outcome data, and evaluated study quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 24 studies (792 740 patients), 18 reported cardiac complications; 6 of the 18 studies were prospective and had uniform outcome surveillance and blinded outcome adjudication. The RCRI discriminated moderately well between patients at low versus high risk for cardiac events after mixed noncardiac surgery (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.79]); sensitivity, 0.65 [CI, 0.46 to 0.81]; specificity, 0.76 [CI, 0.58 to 0.88]; positive likelihood ratio, 2.78 [CI, 1.74 to 4.45]; negative likelihood ratio, 0.45 [CI, 0.31 to 0.67]). Prediction of cardiac events after vascular noncardiac surgery was less accurate (AUC, 0.64 [CI, 0.61 to 0.66]; sensitivity, 0.70 [CI, 0.53 to 0.82]; specificity, 0.55 [CI, 0.45 to 0.66]; positive likelihood ratio, 1.56 [CI, 1.42 to 1.73]; negative likelihood ratio, 0.55 [CI, 0.40 to 0.76]). Six studies reported death, with a median AUC of 0.62 (range, 0.54 to 0.78). A pooled AUC for predicting death could not be calculated because of very high heterogeneity (I(2) = 95%). LIMITATION: Studies generally were of low methodological quality, had varied definitions of cardiac events, and were statistically and clinically heterogeneous.
CONCLUSION: The RCRI discriminated moderately well between patients at low versus high risk for cardiac events after mixed noncardiac surgery. It did not perform well at predicting cardiac events after vascular noncardiac surgery or at predicting death. High-quality research is needed in this area of perioperative medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20048269     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-1-201001050-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  79 in total

1.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: What are the Risk Factors for Cerebrovascular Accidents After Elective Orthopaedic Surgery?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2. 

Authors:  Berrin Günaydın; Ömer Kurtipek
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-01

3.  Mortality predictive indexes for the community-dwelling elderly US population.

Authors:  Zi Zhang; Dawei Xie; Jibby E Kurichi; Joel Streim; Guangyu Zhang; Margaret G Stineman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Clinical utility of the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in non-cardiac surgery for elderly patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yuki Hirano; Hiroya Takeuchi; Koichi Suda; Takashi Oyama; Rieko Nakamura; Tsunehiro Takahashi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Norihito Wada; Yoshiro Saikawa; Hideaki Obara; Hiromitsu Jinno; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Minoru Tanabe; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  A meta-analysis of the predictive accuracy of postoperative mortality using the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status classification system.

Authors:  Chieh Yang Koo; Joseph A Hyder; Jonathan P Wanderer; Matthias Eikermann; Satya Krishna Ramachandran
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Non-cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease: risk evaluation and periprocedural management.

Authors:  Davide Cao; Rishi Chandiramani; Davide Capodanno; Jeffrey S Berger; Matthew A Levin; Mary T Hawn; Dominick J Angiolillo; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Major Cardiac Events After Non-cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Gabriela Sousa; Ana Lopes; Pedro Reis; Vasco Carvalho; Alice Santos; Fernando José Abelha
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The Vascular Quality Initiative Cardiac Risk Index for prediction of myocardial infarction after vascular surgery.

Authors:  Daniel J Bertges; Dan Neal; Andres Schanzer; Salvatore T Scali; Philip P Goodney; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Preoperative Evaluation of the Surgical Patient.

Authors:  Frederick T O'Donnell
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2016 May-Jun

10.  Predicting medical complications after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Amy M Cizik; Deven Hamilton; Jens R Chapman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.