Literature DB >> 33686535

Development of a model to predict the probability of incurring a complication during spine surgery.

Pascal Zehnder1, Ulrike Held2, Tim Pigott3, Andrea Luca4, Markus Loibl5, Raluca Reitmeir5, Tamás Fekete5, Daniel Haschtmann5, Anne F Mannion5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Predictive models in spine surgery are of use in shared decision-making. This study sought to develop multivariable models to predict the probability of general and surgical perioperative complications of spinal surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases.
METHODS: Data came from EUROSPINE's Spine Tango Registry (1.2012-12.2017). Separate prediction models were built for surgical and general complications. Potential predictors included age, gender, previous spine surgery, additional pathology, BMI, smoking status, morbidity, prophylaxis, technology used, and the modified Mirza invasiveness index score. Complete case multiple logistic regression was used. Discrimination was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Plots were used to assess the calibration of the models.
RESULTS: Overall, 23'714/68'111 patients (54.6%) were available for complete case analysis: 763 (3.2%) had a general complication, with ASA score being strongly predictive (ASA-2 OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.20-2.12; ASA-3 OR 2.98, 95% CI 2.19-4.07; ASA-4 OR 5.62, 95% CI 3.04-10.41), while 2534 (10.7%) had a surgical complication, with previous surgery at the same level being an important predictor (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.71-2.12). Respectively, model AUCs were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72-0.76) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.62-0.65), and calibration was good up to predicted probabilities of 0.30 and 0.25, respectively.
CONCLUSION: We developed two models to predict complications associated with spinal surgery. Surgical complications were predicted with less discriminative ability than general complications. Reoperation at the same level was strongly predictive of surgical complications and a higher ASA score, of general complications. A web-based prediction tool was developed at https://sst.webauthor.com/go/fx/run.cfm?fx=SSTCalculator .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Degenerative spine; Patient outcome; Prediction model; Spine surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 33686535     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06777-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Sara Khor; Danielle Lavallee; Amy M Cizik; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Christopher R Howe; Dawei Lu; A Alex Mohit; Rod J Oskouian; Jeffrey R Roh; Neal Shonnard; Armagan Dagal; David R Flum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Predicting surgical site infection after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Amy M Cizik; Deven Hamilton; Jens R Chapman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Yaoming Liu; Jennifer L Paruch; Lynn Zhou; Thomas E Kmiecik; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability.

Authors:  Matthew J McGirt; Ahilan Sivaganesan; Anthony L Asher; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  A clinical prediction model to determine outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: data from the prospective, multi-center AOSpine North America study.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Branko Kopjar; Alexander Vaccaro; Sangwook Tim Yoon; Paul M Arnold; Eric M Massicotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K F Spratt; T S Keller; M Szpalski; K Vandeputte; R Gunzburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Predicting medical complications after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Amy M Cizik; Deven Hamilton; Jens R Chapman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Predicting Surgical Complications in Patients Undergoing Elective Adult Spinal Deformity Procedures Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Jun S Kim; Varun Arvind; Eric K Oermann; Deepak Kaji; Will Ranson; Chierika Ukogu; Awais K Hussain; John Caridi; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2018 Nov - Dec

9.  Surgical Outcome Predictor in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease Based on Health Related Quality of Life Using Euro-Quality 5 Dimensions Analysis.

Authors:  Byung Ho Lee; Jae Ho Yang; Hwan Mo Lee; Jun Young Park; Sang Eun Park; Seong Hwan Moon
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Would government compensation of living kidney donors exploit the poor? An empirical analysis.

Authors:  Philip J Held; Frank McCormick; Glenn M Chertow; Thomas G Peters; John P Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.