INTRODUCTION: Being able to quantify the invasiveness of a surgical procedure is important to weigh up its associated risks, since invasiveness governs the blood loss, operative time and likelihood of complications. Mirza et al. (Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2651-2661, 2008) published an invasiveness index for spinal surgery. We evaluated the validity of a modified version of the Mirza invasiveness index (mMII), adapted for use with registry data. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed with data acquired from the Spine Tango registry including 21,634 patients. The mMII was calculated as the sum of six possible interventions on each vertebral level: decompression, fusion and stabilization either on anterior or posterior structures. The association between the mMII and blood loss, operative time and complications was evaluated using multiple regression, adjusting for possible confounders. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) mMII was 3.9 ± 5.0 (range 0-40). A 1-point increase in the mMII was associated with an additional blood loss of 12.8% (95% CI 12.6-13.0; p < 0.001) and an increase of operative time of 10.4 min (95% CI 10.20-10.53; p < 0.001). The R2 for the blood loss model was of 43% and for operative time, 47%. The mean mMII was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in patients with surgical complications (4.5 ± 5.6) and general medical complications (6.5 ± 7.0) compared to those without (3.8 ± 4.9). Our results were comparable to those reported in the original publication of Mirza et al. CONCLUSION: The mMII appeared to be a valid measure of surgical invasiveness in our study population. It can be used in predictor models and to adjust for surgical case-mix when comparing outcomes in different studies or different hospitals/surgeons in a registry.
INTRODUCTION: Being able to quantify the invasiveness of a surgical procedure is important to weigh up its associated risks, since invasiveness governs the blood loss, operative time and likelihood of complications. Mirza et al. (Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2651-2661, 2008) published an invasiveness index for spinal surgery. We evaluated the validity of a modified version of the Mirza invasiveness index (mMII), adapted for use with registry data. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed with data acquired from the Spine Tango registry including 21,634 patients. The mMII was calculated as the sum of six possible interventions on each vertebral level: decompression, fusion and stabilization either on anterior or posterior structures. The association between the mMII and blood loss, operative time and complications was evaluated using multiple regression, adjusting for possible confounders. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) mMII was 3.9 ± 5.0 (range 0-40). A 1-point increase in the mMII was associated with an additional blood loss of 12.8% (95% CI 12.6-13.0; p < 0.001) and an increase of operative time of 10.4 min (95% CI 10.20-10.53; p < 0.001). The R2 for the blood loss model was of 43% and for operative time, 47%. The mean mMII was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in patients with surgical complications (4.5 ± 5.6) and general medical complications (6.5 ± 7.0) compared to those without (3.8 ± 4.9). Our results were comparable to those reported in the original publication of Mirza et al. CONCLUSION: The mMII appeared to be a valid measure of surgical invasiveness in our study population. It can be used in predictor models and to adjust for surgical case-mix when comparing outcomes in different studies or different hospitals/surgeons in a registry.
Authors: Karel G M Moons; Andre Pascal Kengne; Diederick E Grobbee; Patrick Royston; Yvonne Vergouwe; Douglas G Altman; Mark Woodward Journal: Heart Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Greger Lønne; Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Dennis Nordvall; Paul Gerdhem; Tobias Lagerbäck; Mikkel Andersen; Søren Eiskjaer; Martin Gehrchen; Wilco Jacobs; Miranda L van Hooff; Tore K Solberg Journal: Spine J Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Gazanfar Rahmathulla; Eric W Nottmeier; Stephen M Pirris; H Gordon Deen; Mark A Pichelmann Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Peter G Campbell; Sanjay Yadla; Jennifer Malone; Mitchell G Maltenfort; James S Harrop; Ashwini D Sharan; John K Ratliff Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Margaret A Olsen; Jeffrey J Nepple; K Daniel Riew; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Jennie Mayfield; Victoria J Fraser Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Pascal Zehnder; Ulrike Held; Tim Pigott; Andrea Luca; Markus Loibl; Raluca Reitmeir; Tamás Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; Anne F Mannion Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Ayush Arora; Joshua Demb; Daniel D Cummins; Vedat Deviren; Aaron J Clark; Christopher P Ames; Alekos A Theologis Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2022-09-20
Authors: J C Le Huec; S AlEissa; A J Bowey; B Debono; A El-Shawarbi; N Fernández-Baillo; K S Han; A Martin-Benlloch; R Pflugmacher; P Sabatier; D Vanni; I Walker; T Warren; S Litrico Journal: Neurospine Date: 2022-03-31