Literature DB >> 22336972

Using the spine surgical invasiveness index to identify risk of surgical site infection: a multivariate analysis.

Amy M Cizik1, Michael J Lee, Brook I Martin, Richard J Bransford, Carlo Bellabarba, Jens R Chapman, Sohail K Mirza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection after spine surgery is a well-known complication that can result in poor outcomes, arthrodesis-site nonunion, and neurological injury. We hypothesized that a higher surgical invasiveness score will increase the risk for surgical site infection following spine surgery.
METHODS: Data were examined from patients undergoing any type of spinal surgery from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2004, at two academic hospitals. The surgical invasiveness index is a previously validated instrument that accounts for the number of vertebral levels decompressed, arthrodesed, or instrumented as well as the surgical approach. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each of the categorical variables. Multivariate binomial stepwise logistic regression was used to examine the association between surgical invasiveness and surgical site infection requiring a return to the operating room for treatment, adjusting for confounding risk factors.
RESULTS: The regression analysis of 1532 patients who were evaluated for surgical site infection identified the following significant risk factors for surgical site infection: a body mass index of >35 (relative risk, 2.24 [95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 3.86]; p = 0.01), hypertension (relative risk, 1.73 [95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 2.85]; p = 0.03), thoracic surgery versus cervical surgery (relative risk, 2.57 [95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 5.60]; p = 0.01), lumbosacral surgery versus cervical surgery (relative risk, 2.03 [95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 4.05]; p = 0.02), and a surgical invasiveness index of >21 (relative risk, 3.15 [95% confidence interval, 1.37 to 6.99]; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing more invasive spine surgery as measured with the surgical invasiveness index had greater risk for having a surgical site infection that required a return to the operating room for treatment. Surgical invasiveness was the strongest risk factor for surgical site infection, even after adjusting for medical comorbidities, age, and other known risk factors. The magnitude of this association should be considered during surgical decision-making and intraoperative and postoperative care of the patient. These findings further validate the importance of the invasiveness index when performing safety and clinical outcome comparisons for spine surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22336972      PMCID: PMC3273877          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

1.  Development of an index to characterize the "invasiveness" of spine surgery: validation by comparison to blood loss and operative time.

Authors:  Sohail K Mirza; Richard A Deyo; Patrick J Heagerty; Mark A Konodi; Lorri A Lee; Judith A Turner; Robert Goodkin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Fang; Serena S Hu; Nathan Endres; David S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Diabetes and early postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion.

Authors:  James A Browne; Chad Cook; Ricardo Pietrobon; M Angelyn Bethel; William J Richardson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Risk factors for surgical site infection in the patient with spinal injury.

Authors:  Oren G Blam; Alexander R Vaccaro; Jed S Vanichkachorn; Todd J Albert; Alan S Hilibrand; John M Minnich; Sheila A Murphey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Risk factors for spinal surgical-site infections in a community hospital: a case-control study.

Authors:  Anucha Apisarnthanarak; Marilyn Jones; Brian M Waterman; Cathy M Carroll; Robert Bernardi; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection following adult spinal surgery.

Authors:  Albert F Pull ter Gunne; David B Cohen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse cesarean section.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Anne M Butler; Denise M Willers; Preetishma Devkota; Gilad A Gross; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Jennie Mayfield; Carl Lauryssen; Louis B Polish; Marilyn Jones; Joshua Vest; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Risk factors for surgical site infection complicating laminectomy.

Authors:  N Deborah Friedman; Daniel J Sexton; Sarah M Connelly; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Towards standardized measurement of adverse events in spine surgery: conceptual model and pilot evaluation.

Authors:  Sohail K Mirza; Richard A Deyo; Patrick J Heagerty; Judith A Turner; Lorri A Lee; Robert Goodkin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  32 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Sara Khor; Danielle Lavallee; Amy M Cizik; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Christopher R Howe; Dawei Lu; A Alex Mohit; Rod J Oskouian; Jeffrey R Roh; Neal Shonnard; Armagan Dagal; David R Flum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 2.  Body mass index and risk of surgical site infection following spine surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dima Y Abdallah; Mutaz M Jadaan; John P McCabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Use of patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction for quality assessments.

Authors:  Anne P Ehlers; Sara Khor; Amy M Cizik; Jean-Christophe A Leveque; Neal S Shonnard; Rod J Oskouian; David R Flum; Danielle C Lavallee
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Development of a model to predict the probability of incurring a complication during spine surgery.

Authors:  Pascal Zehnder; Ulrike Held; Tim Pigott; Andrea Luca; Markus Loibl; Raluca Reitmeir; Tamás Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Postdischarge antibiotic use for prophylaxis following spinal fusion.

Authors:  David K Warren; Katelin B Nickel; Jennifer H Han; Pam Tolomeo; Christopher J Hostler; Katherine Foy; Ian R Banks; Victoria J Fraser; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 6.  A methodological, systematic review of evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery.

Authors:  Dan Xing; Jian-Xiong Ma; Xin-Long Ma; Dong-Hui Song; Jie Wang; Yang Chen; Yang Yang; Shao-Wen Zhu; Bao-Yi Ma; Rui Feng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Management of postoperative spinal infections.

Authors:  Vishal Hegde; Dennis S Meredith; Christopher K Kepler; Russel C Huang
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-11-18

Review 8.  The challenge of infection prevention in spine surgery: an update.

Authors:  T Ferry; F Valour; S Lustig; F Laurent; G Perrin; C Chidiac; C Barrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-05-21

Review 9.  [Infections after reconstructive spinal interventions : How do I deal with them?]

Authors:  Burkhard Lehner; Michael Akbar; Nicholas A Beckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Predicting medical complications after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Amy M Cizik; Deven Hamilton; Jens R Chapman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.