Literature DB >> 24203717

S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding.

B Hommel1, Y Lippa.   

Abstract

Responses are faster with spatial S-R correspondence than with noncorrespondence (spatial compatibility effect), even if stimulus location is irrelevant (Simon effect). In two experiments, we sought to determine whether stimuli located above and below a fixation point are coded as left and right (and thus affect the selection of left and right responses) if the visual context suggests such a coding. So, stimuli appeared on the left or right eye of a face's image that was tilted by 90° to one side or the other (Experiment 1) or varied between upright and 45° or 90° tilting (Experiment 2). Whether stimulus location was relevant (Experiment 1) or not (Experiment 2), responses were faster with correspondence of (face-based) stimulus location and (egocentrically defined) response location, even if stimulus and response locations varied on physically orthogonal dimensions. This suggests that object-based spatial stimulus codes are formed automatically and thus influence the speed of response selection.

Year:  1995        PMID: 24203717     DOI: 10.3758/BF03210974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Donders'B- and C-reactions and S-R compatibility.

Authors:  D E BROADBENT; M GREGORY
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-06

2.  Stimulus-response compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: the effects of hand position and posture.

Authors:  C F Michaels; S Schilder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-04

3.  Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  K Lamberts; G Tavernier; G d'Ydewalle
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1992-03

4.  Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  T H Stoffer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1991

5.  Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence.

Authors:  J R Simon; J V Hinrichs; J L Craft
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-10

Review 6.  Recognition of disoriented shapes.

Authors:  M C Corballis
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Destination compatibility, affordances, and coding rules: a reply to Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu, and Weeks.

Authors:  C F Michaels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects?

Authors:  E Ladavas; M Moscovitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors.

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltà; E Ladavas
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1984-10

10.  Stimulus-response compatibility and the motor system.

Authors:  D W Bauer; J Miller
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1982-08
View more
  18 in total

1.  Deconstructing Marilyn: robust effects of face contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  R W Proctor; D F Pick
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  Processing of irrelevant location information under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Jochen Müsseler; Peter Wühr; Carlo Umiltá
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

4.  Effect of image orientation on the eye direction aftereffect.

Authors:  Jun'ichiro Seyama
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-05-21

Review 5.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Seeing through the cat's eyes: evidence of a spontaneous perspective taking process using a non-human avatar.

Authors:  Gioacchino Garofalo; Luiz L Gawryszewski; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-02-24

7.  Somatotopic representation of location: evidence from the Simon effect.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Michael McCloskey; H Branch Coslett; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Spatial coding for the Simon effect in visual search.

Authors:  Dexuan Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou; Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Elisabetta Ladavas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Effects of face and inanimate-object contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  David F Pick; Sandra Specker; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

Review 10.  Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding).

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.