Literature DB >> 24065284

Effects of face and inanimate-object contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.

David F Pick1, Sandra Specker, Kim-Phuong L Vu, Robert W Proctor.   

Abstract

Prior studies have shown that a left-right spatial compatibility effect occurs for vertically oriented stimuli relative to a background context of a face rotated 90° clockwise or counterclockwise from upright. For stimuli presented at the location of the eyes, the mapping of the right eye to a right response and the left eye to a left response, as would be viewed by the participant, yields better performance than does the opposite mapping. An issue of current interest in social cognition is whether animate objects are processed differently from inanimate ones. We investigated this issue in two experiments in which we compared the compatibility effects obtained with inanimate objects to those obtained with animate, face stimuli. The results showed left-right compatibility effects from the participant's perspective for vehicles and faces from frontal and profile views, as well as for a road sign. Our findings indicate that coding of stimulus location relative to an external frame of reference is not restricted to face backgrounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24065284     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0520-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  6 in total

1.  Deconstructing Marilyn: robust effects of face contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  R W Proctor; D F Pick
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensions.

Authors:  Kim-Phuong L Vu; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

4.  S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding.

Authors:  B Hommel; Y Lippa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09

5.  Shared representations in body perception.

Authors:  Richard Thomas; Clare Press; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2005-09-27

6.  Agency attribution and visuospatial perspective taking.

Authors:  Jan Zwickel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Seeing through the cat's eyes: evidence of a spontaneous perspective taking process using a non-human avatar.

Authors:  Gioacchino Garofalo; Luiz L Gawryszewski; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-02-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.