Literature DB >> 10586575

Deconstructing Marilyn: robust effects of face contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.

R W Proctor1, D F Pick.   

Abstract

Hommel and Lippa (1995) found a left-right spatial compatibility effect with respect to a background context of Marilyn Monroe's face, rotated 90 degrees clockwise or counterclockwise from upright, when subjects responded to up or down stimuli by pressing a left or a right key. They interpreted their results as providing evidence for object-based coding of stimulus location. We conducted four experiments in order to evaluate the reliability of this face context effect, to control for possible artifacts and evaluate alternative explanations, and to establish generalizability to other face contexts. This was accomplished by using not only the original photograph, but also a mirror-reversed image, chimeric faces composed from the left or the right sides of the original photograph, an outline drawing face, and a circle with markings for facial features. Our results were much stronger than those of Hommel and Lippa, and the face context effect was found for all of the face variations. Our experiments also provided evidence to suggest that asymmetric coding of the up and down locations contributes to performance in the face context as well.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10586575     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  12 in total

1.  Stimulus-response compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: the effects of hand position and posture.

Authors:  C F Michaels; S Schilder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-04

2.  S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding.

Authors:  B Hommel; Y Lippa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09

3.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

Review 4.  What is "special" about face perception?

Authors:  M J Farah; K D Wilson; M Drain; J N Tanaka
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Stimulus-response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: evidence for spatial coding.

Authors:  D J Weeks; R W Proctor; B Beyak
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1995-05

6.  Do the same stimulus-response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice?

Authors:  R W Proctor; A Dutta
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity.

Authors:  B Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

8.  Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects?

Authors:  E Ladavas; M Moscovitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Stimulus-response compatibility and the motor system.

Authors:  D W Bauer; J Miller
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1982-08

10.  Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility.

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltà
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-04
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Effect of image orientation on the eye direction aftereffect.

Authors:  Jun'ichiro Seyama
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-05-21

Review 3.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Seeing through the cat's eyes: evidence of a spontaneous perspective taking process using a non-human avatar.

Authors:  Gioacchino Garofalo; Luiz L Gawryszewski; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-02-24

5.  Effects of face and inanimate-object contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  David F Pick; Sandra Specker; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.