Literature DB >> 2030931

Stimulus-response compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: the effects of hand position and posture.

C F Michaels1, S Schilder.   

Abstract

Stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility effects between vertically oriented stimuli (above or below fixation) and horizontally oriented responses (left or right switch deflections by a single hand) have been shown to depend both on which hand responds (Bauer & Miller, 1982) and on the location at which the response is made (eccentricity on a frontoparallel line; Michaels, 1989). In the latter study, hand position and hand posture were confounded, so it is unclear which variable determined the compatibility effect. In Experiment 1, the importance of effector position was tested. Vertically oriented stimuli were paired with a horizontal response solicited at different locations but always involving the same hand posture. Compatibility effects emerged, and their direction depended on position. In Experiment 2, the compatibilities were not evident in a simple reaction time paradigm, so the effect was not due to differential ease of responses. In Experiment 3, a change in hand posture (palm up or palm down) at the same location (the body midline) also affected the compatibilities. It was concluded that the S-R compatibility of orthogonally oriented stimuli and responses is influenced by (1) which hand responds, (2) the location of that hand, and (3) its posture. The results imply that both postural and positional states of the action system affect S-R compatibility.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2030931     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

Review 1.  Coordination.

Authors:  M T Turvey
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-08

2.  Spatial S-R compatibility with orthogonal stimulus-response relationship.

Authors:  W H Ehrenstein; P Schroeder-Heister; G Heister
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-03

3.  Mapping of extracorporeal space by vibrotactile reaction times: a far-left-side disadvantage.

Authors:  J M Pierson-Savage; J L Bradshaw
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Spatial S-R compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positions.

Authors:  G Heister; W H Ehrenstein; P Schroeder-Heister
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

5.  Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatibility as a function of task complexity.

Authors:  J Callan; D Klisz; O A Parsons
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-06

6.  S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances.

Authors:  C F Michaels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The spatial characteristics of tactile form perception.

Authors:  S R Oldfield; J R Phillips
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing.

Authors:  W H Warren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Stimulus-response compatibility and the motor system.

Authors:  D W Bauer; J Miller
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1982-08
  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Deconstructing Marilyn: robust effects of face contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  R W Proctor; D F Pick
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  Stimulus-set location does not affect orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-11-22

4.  S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding.

Authors:  B Hommel; Y Lippa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09

5.  Polarity correspondence effect between loudness and lateralized response set.

Authors:  Seah Chang; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.