Literature DB >> 35201537

Seeing through the cat's eyes: evidence of a spontaneous perspective taking process using a non-human avatar.

Gioacchino Garofalo1, Luiz L Gawryszewski2, Lucia Riggio3.   

Abstract

In many daily face-to-face interactions, people are able to take the perspective of others, for example, coding right and left based on point-of-view of others. In the present study, we investigated whether observers are able to take the perspective of a non-human figure such as a cat, observing the same effects obtained with human or robot avatars. In both experiments, we used a centrally presented stimulus (i.e. a cat), with its tail lateralized to the left or to the right. Participants had to respond to the side of the tail with a lateralized keypress. In Experiment 1 (spatial perspective taking task), participants were required to explicitly adopt the cat's perspective to respond, whereas in Experiment 2 (SR compatibility task), this was not explicitly required. In both experiments, faster RTs are obtained when the cat is presented back, with a greater difference between front and back views when the tail is on the right; furthermore, there is no temporal modulation of the back-front effect. These common results between the two experiments are interpreted on the basis of the spatial perspective taking processes, elicited voluntarily (Experiment 1) or spontaneously (Experiment 2).
© 2022. Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avatars; Mixed-rule task; Sequence analysis; Spatial compatibility; Spatial perspective taking process; Stimulus asymmetry

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35201537     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-022-01082-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  36 in total

1.  Hand dominance influences the processing of observed bodies.

Authors:  Mark R Gardner; Rosalind Potts
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Influences of multiple spatial stimulus and response codes on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-08

3.  Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: a direct comparison of two competing accounts.

Authors:  Eddy J Davelaar; Jennifer Stevens
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

4.  Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect.

Authors:  L Craighero; L Fadiga; G Rizzolatti; C Umiltà
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  When do humans spontaneously adopt another's visuospatial perspective?

Authors:  Martin Freundlieb; Ágnes M Kovács; Natalie Sebanz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Spatial S-R compatibility with orthogonal stimulus-response relationship.

Authors:  W H Ehrenstein; P Schroeder-Heister; G Heister
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-03

7.  When Far Becomes Near.

Authors:  Andrea Cavallo; Caterina Ansuini; Francesca Capozzi; Barbara Tversky; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-11-19

8.  Sequential analysis of the numerical Stroop effect reveals response suppression.

Authors:  Roi Cohen Kadosh; Wim Gevers; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Altercentric intrusions from multiple perspectives: beyond dyads.

Authors:  Francesca Capozzi; Andrea Cavallo; Tiziano Furlanetto; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  No evidence for automatic response activation with target onset in the avatar-compatibility task.

Authors:  C Böffel; J Müsseler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.