Literature DB >> 1946872

Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.

T H Stoffer1.   

Abstract

The relative functional significance of attention shifts and attentional zooming for the coding of stimulus position in spatial compatibility tasks is demonstrated by proposing and testing experimentally a tentative explanation of the absence of a Simon effect in Experiment 3 of Umiltà and Liotti (1987). It is assumed that the neutral point of the spatial frame of reference for coding spatial position is at the position where attention is focussed immediately before exposition of the stimulus pattern. If a stimulus pattern is exposed to the right or the left of this position a spatial compatibility effect can be observed when the stimulus-response pairing is incompatible. Generalizing from this, one can say that a spatial compatibility effect will be observed if the last step in attentional focussing of the stimulus attribute specifying the response is a horizontal or a vertical attention shift. If the last step in focussing is attentional zooming (change in the representational level attended to), the stimulus pattern is localized at the horizontal and the vertical positions where the last attention shift had positioned the focus. In this case the spatial code is neutral on these dimensions and so no spatial compatibility effect should result. To test this model we conducted two experiments. Experiment 1 replicated the finding of Umiltà and Liotti that there is no Simon effect in the condition with no delay between a positional cue (two small boxes on the left or right of a fixation cross) and the imperative stimulus, whereas in the condition with a delay of 500 ms a Simon effect was observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1946872     DOI: 10.1007/bf01371820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  25 in total

1.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; R L DEININGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-12

2.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; C M SEEGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-09

3.  Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.

Authors:  C B Warner; J F Juola; H Koshino
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-09

4.  On the generality of logical recoding in spatial interference tasks.

Authors:  U Arend; J Wandmacher
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1987-08

5.  Attending to color and shape: the special role of location in selective visual processing.

Authors:  Y Tsal; N Lavie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-07

6.  [Spatial attention: objections to the spotlight model of visual selectivity].

Authors:  A Buchner
Journal:  Z Exp Angew Psychol       Date:  1988

7.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

8.  Effect of ear stimulated on reaction time and movement time.

Authors:  J R Simon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-10

9.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Moving attention: evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention.

Authors:  R Remington; L Pierce
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-04
View more
  32 in total

1.  Attentional processes link perception and action.

Authors:  Stephen J Anderson; Noriko Yamagishi; Vivian Karavia
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect.

Authors:  Fernando Valle-Inclán; Steven A Hackley; Carmen De Labra
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-05-22

4.  Attentional and intentional cueing in a Simon task: an EEG-based approach.

Authors:  Edmund Wascher; M Wolber
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-05-15

5.  Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Logan Pedersen; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-30

6.  Mechanisms underlying spatial coding in a multiple-item Simon task.

Authors:  Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Piotr Jaśkowski; Rolf Verleger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-05-01

7.  Processing of irrelevant location information under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Jochen Müsseler; Peter Wühr; Carlo Umiltá
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

8.  The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects.

Authors:  María Jesús Funes; Juan Lupiáñez; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-01-06

9.  Movement planning and attentional control of visuospatial working memory: evidence from a grasp-to-place task.

Authors:  M A Spiegel; D Koester; T Schack
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-06

10.  S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding.

Authors:  B Hommel; Y Lippa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.