Literature DB >> 28856774

Group testing regression models with dilution submodels.

Md S Warasi1, Christopher S McMahan2, Joshua M Tebbs3, Christopher R Bilder4.   

Abstract

Group testing, where specimens are tested initially in pools, is widely used to screen individuals for sexually transmitted diseases. However, a common problem encountered in practice is that group testing can increase the number of false negative test results. This occurs primarily when positive individual specimens within a pool are diluted by negative ones, resulting in positive pools testing negatively. If the goal is to estimate a population-level regression model relating individual disease status to observed covariates, severe bias can result if an adjustment for dilution is not made. Recognizing this as a critical issue, recent binary regression approaches in group testing have utilized continuous biomarker information to acknowledge the effect of dilution. In this paper, we have the same overall goal but take a different approach. We augment existing group testing regression models (that assume no dilution) with a parametric dilution submodel for pool-level sensitivity and estimate all parameters using maximum likelihood. An advantage of our approach is that it does not rely on external biomarker test data, which may not be available in surveillance studies. Furthermore, unlike previous approaches, our framework allows one to formally test whether dilution is present based on the observed group testing data. We use simulation to illustrate the performance of our estimation and inference methods, and we apply these methods to 2 infectious disease data sets.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binary regression; dilution effect; likelihood ratio test; maximum likelihood; pooled testing; sensitivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28856774      PMCID: PMC5716936          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  25 in total

1.  Regression models for disease prevalence with diagnostic tests on pools of serum samples.

Authors:  S Vansteelandt; E Goetghebeur; T Verstraeten
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Maximally efficient two-stage screening.

Authors:  T Berger; J W Mandell; P Subrahmanya
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Cost-effective pooling of DNA from nasopharyngeal swab samples for large-scale detection of bacteria by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Sophie Edouard; Elsa Prudent; Philippe Gautret; Ziad A Memish; Didier Raoult
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  A general regression framework for group testing data, which incorporates pool dilution effects.

Authors:  Dewei Wang; Christopher S McMahan; Colin M Gallagher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Optimality of group testing in the presence of misclassification.

Authors:  Aiyi Liu; Chunling Liu; Zhiwei Zhang; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Two-stage hierarchical group testing for multiple infections with application to the infertility prevention project.

Authors:  Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher S McMahan; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV and risk factors in Irish prisoners: results of a national cross sectional survey.

Authors:  S Allwright; F Bradley; J Long; J Barry; L Thornton; J V Parry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-08

8.  Pooled nucleic acid testing increases the diagnostic yield of acute HIV infections in a high-risk population compared to 3rd and 4th generation HIV enzyme immunoassays.

Authors:  Mel Krajden; Darrel Cook; Annie Mak; Ken Chu; Navdeep Chahil; Malcolm Steinberg; Michael Rekart; Mark Gilbert
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.168

9.  Bias, efficiency, and agreement for group-testing regression models.

Authors:  Christopher R Bilder; Joshua M Tebbs
Journal:  J Stat Comput Simul       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 1.424

10.  Pathogen detection, testing, and control in fresh broccoli sprouts.

Authors:  Jed W Fahey; Philippe J Ourisson; Frederick H Degnan
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 3.271

View more
  1 in total

1.  Capturing the pool dilution effect in group testing regression: A Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Stella Self; Christopher McMahan; Stefani Mokalled
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.