Literature DB >> 28405965

Bayesian regression for group testing data.

Christopher S McMahan1, Joshua M Tebbs2, Timothy E Hanson2, Christopher R Bilder3.   

Abstract

Group testing involves pooling individual specimens (e.g., blood, urine, swabs, etc.) and testing the pools for the presence of a disease. When individual covariate information is available (e.g., age, gender, number of sexual partners, etc.), a common goal is to relate an individual's true disease status to the covariates in a regression model. Estimating this relationship is a nonstandard problem in group testing because true individual statuses are not observed and all testing responses (on pools and on individuals) are subject to misclassification arising from assay error. Previous regression methods for group testing data can be inefficient because they are restricted to using only initial pool responses and/or they make potentially unrealistic assumptions regarding the assay accuracy probabilities. To overcome these limitations, we propose a general Bayesian regression framework for modeling group testing data. The novelty of our approach is that it can be easily implemented with data from any group testing protocol. Furthermore, our approach will simultaneously estimate assay accuracy probabilities (along with the covariate effects) and can even be applied in screening situations where multiple assays are used. We apply our methods to group testing data collected in Iowa as part of statewide screening efforts for chlamydia, and we make user-friendly R code available to practitioners.
© 2017, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binary regression; Latent response; Pooled testing; Specimen pooling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28405965      PMCID: PMC5638690          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  23 in total

1.  Regression models for disease prevalence with diagnostic tests on pools of serum samples.

Authors:  S Vansteelandt; E Goetghebeur; T Verstraeten
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Comparison of group testing algorithms for case identification in the presence of test error.

Authors:  Hae-Young Kim; Michael G Hudgens; Jonathan M Dreyfuss; Daniel J Westreich; Christopher D Pilcher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Pooled biological specimens for human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Amy L Heffernan; Lesa L Aylward; Leisa-Maree L Toms; Peter D Sly; Matthew Macleod; Jochen F Mueller
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  An improved test of latent-variable model misspecification in structural measurement error models for group testing data.

Authors:  Xianzheng Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Optimality of group testing in the presence of misclassification.

Authors:  Aiyi Liu; Chunling Liu; Zhiwei Zhang; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Two-dimensional informative array testing.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Cost savings and increased efficiency using a stratified specimen pooling strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Joanna Lynn Lewis; Vivian Marie Lockary; Sadika Kobic
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Optimal retesting configurations for hierarchical group testing.

Authors:  Michael S Black; Christopher R Bilder; Joshua M Tebbs
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 1.864

9.  Risk factors for genital chlamydial infection.

Authors:  Christine Navarro; Anne Jolly; Rama Nair; Yue Chen
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-05

10.  Pooled nucleic acid testing increases the diagnostic yield of acute HIV infections in a high-risk population compared to 3rd and 4th generation HIV enzyme immunoassays.

Authors:  Mel Krajden; Darrel Cook; Annie Mak; Ken Chu; Navdeep Chahil; Malcolm Steinberg; Michael Rekart; Mark Gilbert
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.168

View more
  2 in total

1.  Regression analysis and variable selection for two-stage multiple-infection group testing data.

Authors:  Juexin Lin; Dewei Wang; Qi Zheng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Generalized additive regression for group testing data.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Christopher S McMahan; Joshua M Tebbs; Colin M Gallagher; Christopher R Bilder
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.899

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.