Literature DB >> 24190908

Perceived contrast in complex images.

Andrew M Haun1, Eli Peli.   

Abstract

To understand how different spatial frequencies contribute to the overall perceived contrast of complex, broadband photographic images, we adapted the classification image paradigm. Using natural images as stimuli, we randomly varied relative contrast amplitude at different spatial frequencies and had human subjects determine which images had higher contrast. Then, we determined how the random variations corresponded with the human judgments. We found that the overall contrast of an image is disproportionately determined by how much contrast is between 1 and 6 c/°, around the peak of the contrast sensitivity function (CSF). We then employed the basic components of contrast psychophysics modeling to show that the CSF alone is not enough to account for our results and that an increase in gain control strength toward low spatial frequencies is necessary. One important consequence of this is that contrast constancy, the apparent independence of suprathreshold perceived contrast and spatial frequency, will not hold during viewing of natural images. We also found that images with darker low-luminance regions tended to be judged as having higher overall contrast, which we interpret as the consequence of darker local backgrounds resulting in higher band-limited contrast response in the visual system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast contancy; contrast gain control; natural scenes; perceived contrast; reverse correlation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24190908      PMCID: PMC3817960          DOI: 10.1167/13.13.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  81 in total

1.  Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images.

Authors:  Peter J Bex; Walter Makous
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Normalization: contrast-gain control in simple (Fourier) and complex (non-Fourier) pathways of pattern vision.

Authors:  N Graham; A Sutter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A unified theory of brightness contrast and assimilation incorporating oriented multiscale spatial filtering and contrast normalization.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  On the effectiveness of noise masks: naturalistic vs. un-naturalistic image statistics.

Authors:  Bruce C Hansen; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Contrast in complex images.

Authors:  E Peli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes.

Authors:  Bruce C Hansen; Edward A Essock
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  What's constant in contrast constancy? The effects of scaling on the perceived contrast of bandpass patterns.

Authors:  N Brady; D J Field
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Darks are processed faster than lights.

Authors:  Stanley Jose Komban; Jose-Manuel Alonso; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Nonlinearities of near-threshold contrast transduction.

Authors:  L L Kontsevich; C W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Adaptive changes in visual cortex following prolonged contrast reduction.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge; Fang Fang; Allen M Y Cheong; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Sensitivity to gaze-contingent contrast increments in naturalistic movies: An exploratory report and model comparison.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Michael Dorr; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  What is visible across the visual field?

Authors:  Andrew M Haun
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2021-06-01

3.  Dynamic properties of internal noise probed by modulating binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Bruno Richard
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Contrast normalisation masks natural expression-related differences and artificially enhances the perceived salience of fear expressions.

Authors:  Abigail L M Webb; Paul B Hibbard; Rick O'Gorman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Suppression durations for facial expressions under breaking continuous flash suppression: effects of faces' low-level image properties.

Authors:  Abigail L M Webb; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Reversing the Luminance Polarity of Control Faces: Why Are Some Negative Faces Harder to Recognize, but Easier to See?

Authors:  Abigail L M Webb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-21

7.  Spatial structure, phase, and the contrast of natural images.

Authors:  Reuben Rideaux; Rebecca K West; Thomas S A Wallis; Peter J Bex; Jason B Mattingley; William J Harrison
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.004

8.  Natural Contrast Statistics Facilitate Human Face Categorization.

Authors:  Joan Liu-Shuang; Yu-Fang Yang; Bruno Rossion; Valérie Goffaux
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-10-06

9.  A normalized contrast-encoding model exhibits bright/dark asymmetries similar to early visual neurons.

Authors:  Emily A Cooper
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2016-04

10.  Conjoint measurement of perceived transparency and perceived contrast in variegated checkerboards.

Authors:  Guillermo Aguilar; Marianne Maertens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.