Literature DB >> 33551920

Reversing the Luminance Polarity of Control Faces: Why Are Some Negative Faces Harder to Recognize, but Easier to See?

Abigail L M Webb1.   

Abstract

Control stimuli are key for understanding the extent to which face processing relies on holistic processing, and affective evaluation versus the encoding of low-level image properties. Luminance polarity (LP) reversal combined with face inversion is a popular tool for severely disrupting the recognition of face controls. However, recent findings demonstrate visibility-recognition trade-offs for LP-reversed faces, where these face controls sometimes appear more salient despite being harder to recognize. The present report brings together findings from image analysis, simple stimuli, and behavioral data for facial recognition and visibility, in an attempt to disentangle instances where LP-reversed control faces are associated with a performance bias in terms of their perceived salience. These findings have important implications for studies of subjective face appearance, and highlight that future research must be aware of behavioral artifacts due to the possibility of trade-off effects.
Copyright © 2021 Webb.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apparent contrast; control faces; face perception; facial recognition; luminance polarity; negative faces; skewness; spatial inversion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33551920      PMCID: PMC7858267          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  38 in total

Review 1.  Recognizing faces.

Authors:  H D Ellis
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1975-11

2.  The many faces of configural processing.

Authors:  Daphne Maurer; Richard Le Grand; Catherine J. Mondloch
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Attention to faces: a change-blindness study.

Authors:  Temre N Davies; Donald D Hoffman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Brightness, discriminability and the "crispening effect".

Authors:  P Whittle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Face inversion and contrast-reversal effects across development: in contrast to the expertise theory.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2004-04

6.  Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negation.

Authors:  Richard Russell; Pawan Sinha; Irving Biederman; Marissa Nederhouser
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Anthony T Herdman; Nathalie George; Douglas Cheyne; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; David H Zald; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2007-11

9.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise.

Authors:  R Diamond; S Carey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-06

Review 10.  On the use of continuous flash suppression for the study of visual processing outside of awareness.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Jan Brascamp; Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.