Literature DB >> 2231113

Contrast in complex images.

E Peli1.   

Abstract

The physical contrast of simple images such as sinusoidal gratings or a single patch of light on a uniform background is well defined and agrees with the perceived contrast, but this is not so for complex images. Most definitions assign a single contrast value to the whole image, but perceived contrast may vary greatly across the image. Human contrast sensitivity is a function of spatial frequency; therefore the spatial frequency content of an image should be considered in the definition of contrast. In this paper a definition of local band-limited contrast in images is proposed that assigns a contrast value to every point in the image as a function of the spatial frequency band. For each frequency band, the contrast is defined as the ratio of the bandpass-filtered image at the frequency to the low-pass image filtered to an octave below the same frequency (local luminance mean). This definition raises important implications regarding the perception of contrast in complex images and is helpful in understanding the effects of image-processing algorithms on the perceived contrast. A pyramidal image-contrast structure based on this definition is useful in simulating nonlinear, threshold characteristics of spatial vision in both normal observers and the visually impaired.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2231113     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.7.002032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  103 in total

1.  Fundus autofluorescence imaging compared with different confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopes.

Authors:  C Bellmann; G S Rubin; S A Kabanarou; A C Bird; F W Fitzke
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Why is it difficult to see in the fog? How stimulus contrast affects visual perception and visual memory.

Authors:  Erin M Harley; Allyss M Dillon; Geoffrey R Loftus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

3.  Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise.

Authors:  Cierra Hall; Shu Wang; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Dopaminergic modulation of mitral cells and odor responses in the zebrafish olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Sebastian T Bundschuh; Peixin Zhu; Yan-Ping Zhang Schärer; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Shift in spatial scale in identifying crowded letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Using a visual discrimination model for the detection of compression artifacts in virtual pathology images.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Johnson; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Michelle Yan; Hans Roehrig; Anna R Graham; Ronald S Weinstein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Quantitative image quality evaluation of MR images using perceptual difference models.

Authors:  Jun Miao; Donglai Huo; David L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Affective priming of emotional pictures in parafoveal vision: left visual field advantage.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Pedro Avero
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Characterisation of impaired wound healing in a preclinical model of induced diabetes using wide-field imaging and conventional immunohistochemistry assays.

Authors:  Mayer Saidian; Jonathan R T Lakey; Adrien Ponticorvo; Rebecca Rowland; Melissa Baldado; Joshua Williams; Maaikee Pronda; Michael Alexander; Antonio Flores; Li Shiri; Stellar Zhang; Bernard Choi; Roni Kohen; Bruce J Tromberg; Anthony J Durkin
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Efficient integration across spatial frequencies for letter identification in foveal and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.