Literature DB >> 10343878

Nonlinearities of near-threshold contrast transduction.

L L Kontsevich1, C W Tyler.   

Abstract

The existence of analytic threshold nonlinearities was probed with 2AFC incremental threshold functions for both local and extended test patterns on stationary matched pedestals of the same and opposite sign. In contrast to the facilitation effect with same-sign pedestals, sensitivity with opposite-sign pedestals first deteriorated up to the mask detection level, abruptly improved and then deteriorated again. Analytic solutions for the transducer function with additive noise were derived to account for the incremental data in all conditions. The results for positive difference-of-Gaussian (DoG) stimuli (whose increment made the central spot lighter) and for 10 c deg-1 Gabor stimuli were consistent with accurate hard-threshold behavior with best-fitting d' powers from 17 to 358. The 10 c deg-1 data further implied that contrast gain control was operating throughout the subthreshold range. The results for negative DoGs (whose increment corresponds to the darkening of the central spot) and 2 c deg-1 Gabor profiles were consistent with mild nonlinearities having d' powers of 1.6-3. Significant differences between the nonlinearities for positive and negative DoGs indicate that only a small portion, if any, of the near-threshold nonlinearity could be attributed to uncertainty. Our analysis suggests that, with low spatial frequency gratings, detection was based on those bars that become darker; with high-frequency gratings, on the bars that become brighter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343878     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00286-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination.

Authors:  C C Chen; C W Tyler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Generation of black-dominant responses in V1 cortex.

Authors:  Dajun Xing; Chun-I Yeh; Robert M Shapley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The functional asymmetry of ON and OFF channels in the perception of contrast.

Authors:  Yaoguang Jiang; Gopathy Purushothaman; Vivien A Casagrande
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Global motion perception is independent from contrast sensitivity for coherent motion direction discrimination and visual acuity in 4.5-year-old children.

Authors:  Arijit Chakraborty; Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Nabin Paudel; Linda L LaGasse; Barry M Lester; Trecia A Wouldes; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A noisy transform predicts saccadic and manual reaction times to changes in contrast.

Authors:  M J Taylor; R H S Carpenter; A J Anderson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Perceptual learning in contrast detection: presence and cost of shifts in response criteria.

Authors:  Michael J Wenger; Christoph Rasche
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

7.  Perceived contrast in complex images.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  "Black" responses dominate macaque primary visual cortex v1.

Authors:  Chun-I Yeh; Dajun Xing; Robert M Shapley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The twinkle aftereffect is pre-cortical and is independent of filling-in.

Authors:  Michael D Crossland; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Contrast Gain Control in Plaid Pattern Detection.

Authors:  Pi-Chun Huang; Chien-Chung Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.