Literature DB >> 24189992

Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception.

Sven L Mattys1, Katharine Barden, Arthur G Samuel.   

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that the extrinsic cognitive load generated by performing a nonlinguistic visual task while perceiving speech increases listeners' reliance on lexical knowledge and decreases their capacity to perceive phonetic detail. In the present study, we asked whether this effect is accounted for better at a lexical or a sublexical level. The former would imply that cognitive load directly affects lexical activation but not perceptual sensitivity; the latter would imply that increased lexical reliance under cognitive load is only a secondary consequence of imprecise or incomplete phonetic encoding. Using the phoneme restoration paradigm, we showed that perceptual sensitivity decreases (i.e., phoneme restoration increases) almost linearly with the effort involved in the concurrent visual task. However, cognitive load had only a minimal effect on the contribution of lexical information to phoneme restoration. We concluded that the locus of extrinsic cognitive load on the speech system is perceptual rather than lexical. Mechanisms by which cognitive load increases tolerance to acoustic imprecision and broadens phonemic categories were discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24189992     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0544-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Attention modulates sound processing in human auditory cortex but not the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Teemu Rinne; G Christopher Stecker; Xiaojian Kang; E William Yund; Timothy J Herron; David L Woods
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Speech perception engages a general timer: evidence from a divided attention word identification task.

Authors:  Laurence Casini; Boris Burle; Noël Nguyen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-05-19

3.  Auditory selective attention modulates activation of human inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Teemu Rinne; Marja H Balk; Sonja Koistinen; Taina Autti; Kimmo Alho; Mikko Sams
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of Attention on the Strength of Lexical Influences on Speech Perception: Behavioral Experiments and Computational Mechanisms.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James L McClelland; Lori L Holt; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-03

5.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Phoneme categorization and discrimination in younger and older adults: a comparative analysis of perceptual, lexical, and attentional factors.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Odette Scharenborg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-03

8.  Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Attentional modulation of the phonetic significance of acoustic cues.

Authors:  P C Gordon; J L Eberhardt; J G Rueckl
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  15 in total

1.  The Activation of Embedded Words in Spoken Word Recognition.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015 February-April       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Difficulty in learning similar-sounding words: A developmental stage or a general property of learning?

Authors:  Bozena Pajak; Sarah C Creel; Roger Levy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Cognitive and Physiological Measures of Listening Effort During Degraded Speech Perception: Relating Dual-Task and Pupillometry Paradigms.

Authors:  Sarah Colby; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter; Larry E Humes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Only Behavioral But Not Self-Report Measures of Speech Perception Correlate with Cognitive Abilities.

Authors:  Antje Heinrich; Helen Henshaw; Melanie A Ferguson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-23

8.  Visual Rhyme Judgment in Adults With Mild-to-Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Mary Rudner; Henrik Danielsson; Björn Lyxell; Thomas Lunner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-28

9.  Missing phonemes are perceptually restored but differently by native and non-native listeners.

Authors:  Mako Ishida; Takayuki Arai
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-14

10.  Perceptual Restoration of Temporally Distorted Speech in L1 vs. L2: Local Time Reversal and Modulation Filtering.

Authors:  Mako Ishida; Takayuki Arai; Makio Kashino
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.