Literature DB >> 18509503

Effects of Attention on the Strength of Lexical Influences on Speech Perception: Behavioral Experiments and Computational Mechanisms.

Daniel Mirman1, James L McClelland, Lori L Holt, James S Magnuson.   

Abstract

The effects of lexical context on phonological processing are pervasive and there have been indications that such effects may be modulated by attention. However, attentional modulation in speech processing is neither well-documented nor well-understood. Experiment 1 demonstrated attentional modulation of lexical facilitation of speech sound recognition when task and critical stimuli were identical across attention conditions. We propose modulation of lexical activation as a neurophysiologically-plausible computational mechanism that can account for this type of modulation. Contrary to the claims of critics, this mechanism can account for attentional modulation without violating the principle of interactive processing. Simulations of the interactive TRACE model extended to include two different ways of modulating lexical activation showed that each can account for attentional modulation of lexical feedback effects. Experiment 2 tested conflicting predictions from the two implementations and provided evidence that is consistent with bias input as the mechanism of attentional control of lexical activation.

Year:  2008        PMID: 18509503      PMCID: PMC2396758          DOI: 10.1080/03640210701864063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  16 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  The influence of sublexical and lexical representations on the processing of spoken words in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen; Alec Marantz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Time course of top-down and bottom-up influences on syllable processing in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Milene Bonte; Tiina Parviainen; Kaisa Hytönen; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Short-term memory for serial order: a recurrent neural network model.

Authors:  Matthew M Botvinick; David C Plaut
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  A network model of catecholamine effects: gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and behavior.

Authors:  D Servan-Schreiber; H Printz; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task.

Authors:  M A Pitt; A G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  17 in total

1.  Effect of Representational Distance between Meanings on Recognition of Ambiguous Spoken Words.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Ted J Strauss; James A Dixon; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-01

2.  Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Eiling Yee; Sheila E Blumstein; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment.

Authors:  Tuuli Morrill; Melissa Baese-Berk; Christopher Heffner; Laura Dilley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

4.  The Downside of Greater Lexical Influences: Selectively Poorer Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Boji P W Lam; Zilong Xie; Rachel Tessmer; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  A vowel is a vowel: generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts.

Authors:  Kyle E Chambers; Kristine H Onishi; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Adam T Tierney; Giada Guerra; Aeron Laffere; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The pictures who shall not be named: Empirical support for benefits of preview in the Visual World Paradigm.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Jamie Klein-Packard; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 8.  Speech perception as categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Immediate effects of form-class constraints on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  James S Magnuson; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-09

10.  Specificity of dimension-based statistical learning in word recognition.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.