Literature DB >> 26962959

Difficulty in learning similar-sounding words: A developmental stage or a general property of learning?

Bozena Pajak1, Sarah C Creel2, Roger Levy3.   

Abstract

How are languages learned, and to what extent are learning mechanisms similar in infant native-language (L1) and adult second-language (L2) acquisition? In terms of vocabulary acquisition, we know from the infant literature that the ability to discriminate similar-sounding words at a particular age does not guarantee successful word-meaning mapping at that age (Stager & Werker, 1997). However, it is unclear whether this difficulty arises from developmental limitations of young infants (e.g., poorer working memory) or whether it is an intrinsic part of the initial word learning, L1 and L2 alike. In this study, we show that adults of particular L1 backgrounds-just like young infants-have difficulty learning similar-sounding L2 words that they can nevertheless discriminate perceptually. This suggests that the early stages of word learning, whether L1 or L2, intrinsically involve difficulty in mapping similar-sounding words onto referents. We argue that this is due to an interaction between 2 main factors: (a) memory limitations that pose particular challenges for highly similar-sounding words, and (b) uncertainty regarding the language's phonetic categories, because the categories are being learned concurrently with words. Overall, our results show that vocabulary acquisition in infancy and adulthood shares more similarities than previously thought, thus supporting the existence of common learning mechanisms that operate throughout the life span. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26962959      PMCID: PMC5009011          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  40 in total

1.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Individual differences in auditory abilities.

Authors:  Gary R Kidd; Charles S Watson; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The bilingual advantage in novel word learning.

Authors:  Margarita Kaushanskaya; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

Review 4.  Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain.

Authors:  Janet F Werker; Richard C Tees
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Janet F Werker; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-01

6.  The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access.

Authors:  J E Andruski; S E Blumstein; M Burton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-09

7.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning.

Authors:  Gwyneth C Rost; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-03

9.  The effect of the temporal structure of spoken words on paired-associate learning.

Authors:  Sarah C Creel; Delphine Dahan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Adults show less sensitivity to phonetic detail in unfamiliar words, too.

Authors:  Katherine S White; Eiling Yee; Sheila E Blumstein; James L Morgan
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more
  1 in total

1.  The role of abstraction in non-native speech perception.

Authors:  Bozena Pajak; Roger Levy
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2014-09-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.