Literature DB >> 24660803

Phoneme categorization and discrimination in younger and older adults: a comparative analysis of perceptual, lexical, and attentional factors.

Sven L Mattys1, Odette Scharenborg2.   

Abstract

This study investigates the extent to which age-related language processing difficulties are due to a decline in sensory processes or to a deterioration of cognitive factors, specifically, attentional control. Two facets of attentional control were examined: inhibition of irrelevant information and divided attention. Younger and older adults were asked to categorize the initial phoneme of spoken syllables ("Was it m or n?"), trying to ignore the lexical status of the syllables. The phonemes were manipulated to range in eight steps from m to n. Participants also did a discrimination task on syllable pairs ("Were the initial sounds the same or different?"). Categorization and discrimination were performed under either divided attention (concurrent visual-search task) or focused attention (no visual task). The results showed that even when the younger and older adults were matched on their discrimination scores: (1) the older adults had more difficulty inhibiting lexical knowledge than did younger adults, (2) divided attention weakened lexical inhibition in both younger and older adults, and (3) divided attention impaired sound discrimination more in older than younger listeners. The results confirm the independent and combined contribution of sensory decline and deficit in attentional control to language processing difficulties associated with aging. The relative weight of these variables and their mechanisms of action are discussed in the context of theories of aging and language. (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24660803     DOI: 10.1037/a0035387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  13 in total

1.  Top-down or bottom up: decreased stimulus salience increases responses to predictable stimuli of auditory thalamic neurons.

Authors:  Srinivasa P Kommajosyula; Rui Cai; Edward Bartlett; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The Downside of Greater Lexical Influences: Selectively Poorer Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Boji P W Lam; Zilong Xie; Rachel Tessmer; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Responses to Predictable versus Random Temporally Complex Stimuli from Single Units in Auditory Thalamus: Impact of Aging and Anesthesia.

Authors:  Rui Cai; Ben D Richardson; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Lexical bias in word recognition by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Steven P Gianakas; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of visual distraction on auditory-visual speech perception by younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Julie I Cohen; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Early auditory cortical processing predicts auditory speech in noise identification and lipreading.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.054

7.  Age effects on category learning, categorical perception, and generalization.

Authors:  Caitlin R Bowman; Stefania R Ashby; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2021-11-11

8.  Training alters the resolution of lexical interference: Evidence for plasticity of competition and inhibition.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01

9.  Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Katharine Barden; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

10.  Relatively effortless listening promotes understanding and recall of medical instructions in older adults.

Authors:  Roberta M DiDonato; Aimée M Surprenant
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.