Literature DB >> 24167253

Large-scale detection of in vivo transcription errors.

Jean-François Gout1, W Kelley Thomas, Zachary Smith, Kazufusa Okamoto, Michael Lynch.   

Abstract

Accurate transmission and expression of genetic information are crucial for the survival of all living organisms. Recently, the coupling of mutation accumulation experiments and next-generation sequencing has greatly expanded our knowledge of the genomic mutation rate in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. However, because of their transient nature, transcription errors have proven extremely difficult to quantify, and current estimates of transcription fidelity are derived from artificial constructs applied to just a few organisms. Here we report a unique cDNA library preparation technique that allows error detection in natural transcripts at the transcriptome-wide level. Application of this method to the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans revealed a base misincorporation rate in mRNAs of ~4 × 10(-6) per site, with a very biased molecular spectrum. Because the proposed method is readily applicable to other organisms, this innovation provides unique opportunities for studying the incidence of transcription errors across the tree of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C. elegans; RNA polymerase fidelity; base substitution; evolution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24167253      PMCID: PMC3832031          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309843110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  39 in total

1.  On the fidelity of transcription by Escherichia coli ribonucleic acid polymerase.

Authors:  C F Springgate; L A Loeb
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1975-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool.

Authors:  W James Kent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  High direct estimate of the mutation rate in the mitochondrial genome of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  D R Denver; K Morris; M Lynch; L L Vassilieva; W K Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The cellular, developmental and population-genetic determinants of mutation-rate evolution.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolution of the mutation rate.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 6.  Fidelity at the molecular level: lessons from protein synthesis.

Authors:  Hani S Zaher; Rachel Green
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution.

Authors:  D Allan Drummond; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Editing of kinetoplastid mitochondrial mRNAs by uridine addition and deletion generates conserved amino acid sequences and AUG initiation codons.

Authors:  J M Shaw; J E Feagin; K Stuart; L Simpson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-05-06       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  S Brenner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The lower bound to the evolution of mutation rates.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.416

View more
  59 in total

1.  Drift Barriers to Quality Control When Genes Are Expressed at Different Levels.

Authors:  Kun Xiong; Jay P McEntee; David J Porfirio; Joanna Masel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms.

Authors:  Clark Fritsch; Jean-Francois Pierre Gout; Marc Vermulst
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Poor codon optimality as a signal to degrade transcripts with frameshifts.

Authors:  Miquel Àngel Schikora-Tamarit; Lucas B Carey
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2018-08-28

Review 4.  Lost in transcription: transient errors in information transfer.

Authors:  Alasdair J E Gordon; Dominik Satory; Jennifer A Halliday; Christophe Herman
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 5.  Genome stability versus transcript diversity.

Authors:  Brian Magnuson; Karan Bedi; Mats Ljungman
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-16

Review 6.  mRNA Editing, Processing and Quality Control in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Joshua A Arribere; Hidehito Kuroyanagi; Heather A Hundley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Transcriptional errors and the drift barrier.

Authors:  David M McCandlish; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Detecting Rare Mutations and DNA Damage with Sequencing-Based Methods.

Authors:  Daniel B Sloan; Amanda K Broz; Joel Sharbrough; Zhiqiang Wu
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 19.536

9.  Universally high transcript error rates in bacteria.

Authors:  Weiyi Li; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  The evolution and clinical impact of hepatitis B virus genome diversity.

Authors:  Peter A Revill; Thomas Tu; Hans J Netter; Lilly K W Yuen; Stephen A Locarnini; Margaret Littlejohn
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.