Literature DB >> 29550161

Detecting Rare Mutations and DNA Damage with Sequencing-Based Methods.

Daniel B Sloan1, Amanda K Broz2, Joel Sharbrough2, Zhiqiang Wu2.   

Abstract

There is a great need in biomedical and genetic research to detect DNA damage and de novo mutations, but doing so is inherently challenging because of the rarity of these events. The enormous capacity of current DNA sequencing technologies has opened the door for quantifying sequence variants present at low frequencies in vivo, such as within cancerous tissues. However, these sequencing technologies are error prone, resulting in high noise thresholds. Most DNA sequencing methods are also generally incapable of identifying chemically modified bases arising from DNA damage. In recent years, numerous specialized modifications to sequencing methods have been developed to address these shortcomings. Here, we review this landscape of emerging techniques, highlighting their respective strengths, weaknesses, and target applications.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high-fidelity DNA sequencing; oxidative damage; rare variants; subclonal mutations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29550161      PMCID: PMC6004327          DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biotechnol        ISSN: 0167-7799            Impact factor:   19.536


  86 in total

1.  High-throughput DNA sequencing errors are reduced by orders of magnitude using circle sequencing.

Authors:  Dianne I Lou; Jeffrey A Hussmann; Ross M McBee; Ashley Acevedo; Raul Andino; William H Press; Sara L Sawyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  How to deduplicate PCR.

Authors:  Vivien Marx
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  A novel method to quantify base substitution mutations at the 10-6 per bp level in DNA samples.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamashita; Naoko Iida; Hideyuki Takeshima; Naoko Hattori; Masahiro Maeda; Takayoshi Kishino; Reiko Nagano; Taichi Shimazu; Shoichiro Tsugane; Toshikazu Ushijima
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 4.  Genomic approaches to DNA repair and mutagenesis.

Authors:  John J Wyrick; Steven A Roberts
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-09-15

5.  Ultrasensitive measurement of hotspot mutations in tumor DNA in blood using error-suppressed multiplexed deep sequencing.

Authors:  Azeet Narayan; Nicholas J Carriero; Scott N Gettinger; Jeannie Kluytenaar; Kevin R Kozak; Torunn I Yock; Nicole E Muscato; Pedro Ugarelli; Roy H Decker; Abhijit A Patel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Examining Sources of Error in PCR by Single-Molecule Sequencing.

Authors:  Vladimir Potapov; Jennifer L Ong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genome-wide maps of alkylation damage, repair, and mutagenesis in yeast reveal mechanisms of mutational heterogeneity.

Authors:  Peng Mao; Alexander J Brown; Ewa P Malc; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Michael J Smerdon; Steven A Roberts; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  LORD-Q: a long-run real-time PCR-based DNA-damage quantification method for nuclear and mitochondrial genome analysis.

Authors:  Simon Lehle; Dominic G Hildebrand; Britta Merz; Peter N Malak; Michael S Becker; Peter Schmezer; Frank Essmann; Klaus Schulze-Osthoff; Oliver Rothfuss
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Rates and mechanisms of bacterial mutagenesis from maximum-depth sequencing.

Authors:  Justin Jee; Aviram Rasouly; Ilya Shamovsky; Yonatan Akivis; Susan R Steinman; Bud Mishra; Evgeny Nudler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Mapping DNA polymerase errors by single-molecule sequencing.

Authors:  David F Lee; Jenny Lu; Seungwoo Chang; Joseph J Loparo; Xiaoliang S Xie
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  17 in total

1.  MSH1 is required for maintenance of the low mutation rates in plant mitochondrial and plastid genomes.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Wu; Gus Waneka; Amanda K Broz; Connor R King; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  High efficiency error suppression for accurate detection of low-frequency variants.

Authors:  Ting Ting Wang; Sagi Abelson; Jinfeng Zou; Tiantian Li; Zhen Zhao; John E Dick; Liran I Shlush; Trevor J Pugh; Scott V Bratman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Measurement of Oxidatively Induced DNA Damage in Caenorhabditis elegans with High-Salt DNA Extraction and Isotope-Dilution Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Leona D Scanlan; Sanem Hosbas Coskun; Pawel Jaruga; Shannon K Hanna; Christopher M Sims; Jamie L Almeida; David Catoe; Erdem Coskun; Rachel Golan; Miral Dizdaroglu; Bryant C Nelson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  A quantification method of somatic mutations in normal tissues and their accumulation in pediatric patients with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sho Ueda; Satoshi Yamashita; Miho Nakajima; Tadashi Kumamoto; Chitose Ogawa; Yu-Yu Liu; Harumi Yamada; Emi Kubo; Naoko Hattori; Hideyuki Takeshima; Mika Wakabayashi; Naoko Iida; Yuichi Shiraishi; Masayuki Noguchi; Yukio Sato; Toshikazu Ushijima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Development of a versatile high-throughput mutagenesis assay with multiplexed short-read NGS using DNA-barcoded supF shuttle vector library amplified in E. coli.

Authors:  Hidehiko Kawai; Ren Iwata; Shungo Ebi; Ryusei Sugihara; Shogo Masuda; Chiho Fujiwara; Shingo Kimura; Hiroyuki Kamiya
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Mitochondrial mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans show signatures of oxidative damage and an AT-bias.

Authors:  Gus Waneka; Joshua M Svendsen; Justin C Havird; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 7.  Methodologies for detecting environmentally induced DNA damage and repair.

Authors:  Wentao Li; Aziz Sancar
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Detecting de novo mitochondrial mutations in angiosperms with highly divergent evolutionary rates.

Authors:  Amanda K Broz; Gus Waneka; Zhiqiang Wu; Matheus Fernandes Gyorfy; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations in normal cells and cancer risk.

Authors:  Hideyuki Takeshima; Toshikazu Ushijima
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-03-06

10.  Impact of Polymerase Fidelity on Background Error Rates in Next-Generation Sequencing with Unique Molecular Identifiers/Barcodes.

Authors:  Stefan Filges; Emiko Yamada; Anders Ståhlberg; Tony E Godfrey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.