Literature DB >> 24165393

A historical perspective on protein crystallization from 1840 to the present day.

Richard Giegé1.   

Abstract

Protein crystallization has been known since 1840 and can prove to be straightforward but, in most cases, it constitutes a real bottleneck. This stimulated the birth of the biocrystallogenesis field with both 'practical' and 'basic' science aims. In the early years of biochemistry, crystallization was a tool for the preparation of biological substances. Today, biocrystallogenesis aims to provide efficient methods for crystal fabrication and a means to optimize crystal quality for X-ray crystallography. The historical development of crystallization methods for structural biology occurred first in conjunction with that of biochemical and genetic methods for macromolecule production, then with the development of structure determination methodologies and, recently, with routine access to synchrotron X-ray sources. Previously, the identification of conditions that sustain crystal growth occurred mostly empirically but, in recent decades, this has moved progressively towards more rationality as a result of a deeper understanding of the physical chemistry of protein crystal growth and the use of idea-driven screening and high-throughput procedures. Protein and nucleic acid engineering procedures to facilitate crystallization, as well as crystallization methods in gelled-media or by counter-diffusion, represent recent important achievements, although the underlying concepts are old. The new nanotechnologies have brought a significant improvement in the practice of protein crystallization. Today, the increasing number of crystal structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank could mean that crystallization is no longer a bottleneck. This is not the case, however, because structural biology projects always become more challenging and thereby require adapted methods to enable the growth of the appropriate crystals, notably macromolecular assemblages.
© 2013 FEBS.

Keywords:  automation; crystal growth; high-throughput; macromolecular assemblies; methods of crystallization; microgravity; nucleation; nucleic acids; protein crystallization; virus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24165393     DOI: 10.1111/febs.12580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS J        ISSN: 1742-464X            Impact factor:   5.542


  23 in total

1.  Lack of Dependence of the Sizes of the Mesoscopic Protein Clusters on Electrostatics.

Authors:  Maria A Vorontsova; Ho Yin Chan; Vassiliy Lubchenko; Peter G Vekilov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Optimization of crystallization conditions for biological macromolecules.

Authors:  Alexander McPherson; Bob Cudney
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 1.056

Review 3.  Can the propensity of protein crystallization be increased by using systematic screening with metals?

Authors:  Raghurama P Hegde; Gowribidanur C Pavithra; Debayan Dey; Steven C Almo; S Ramakumar; Udupi A Ramagopal
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Combining Wet and Dry Lab Techniques to Guide the Crystallization of Large Coiled-coil Containing Proteins.

Authors:  Jenna K Zalewski; Simone Heber; Joshua H Mo; Keith O'Conor; Jeffrey D Hildebrand; Andrew P VanDemark
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  XPA: A key scaffold for human nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Norie Sugitani; Robert M Sivley; Kelly E Perry; John A Capra; Walter J Chazin
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-20

6.  Catalystlike role of impurities in speeding layer-by-layer growth.

Authors:  Tien M Phan; Stephen Whitelam; Jeremy D Schmit
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.529

7.  Toward the computational design of protein crystals with improved resolution.

Authors:  Jeliazko R Jeliazkov; Aaron C Robinson; Bertrand García-Moreno E; James M Berger; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 7.652

Review 8.  Design of Experiments As a Tool for Optimization in Recombinant Protein Biotechnology: From Constructs to Crystals.

Authors:  Christos Papaneophytou
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.695

9.  Bifunctional cross-linking approaches for mass spectrometry-based investigation of nucleic acids and protein-nucleic acid assemblies.

Authors:  M Scalabrin; S M Dixit; M M Makshood; C E Krzemien; Daniele Fabris
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  Optimizing Associative Experimental Design for Protein Crystallization Screening.

Authors:  Imren Dinc; Marc L Pusey; Ramazan S Aygun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.935

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.