Literature DB >> 31692475

Toward the computational design of protein crystals with improved resolution.

Jeliazko R Jeliazkov1, Aaron C Robinson2, Bertrand García-Moreno E1, James M Berger1, Jeffrey J Gray1.   

Abstract

Substantial advances have been made in the computational design of protein interfaces over the last 20 years. However, the interfaces targeted by design have typically been stable and high-affinity. Here, we report the development of a generic computational design method to stabilize the weak interactions at crystallographic interfaces. Initially, we analyzed structures reported in the Protein Data Bank to determine whether crystals with more stable interfaces result in higher resolution structures. We found that for 22 variants of a single protein crystallized by a single individual, the Rosetta-calculated `crystal score' correlates with the reported diffraction resolution. We next developed and tested a computational design protocol, seeking to identify point mutations that would improve resolution in a highly stable variant of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase). Using a protocol based on fixed protein backbones, only one of the 11 initial designs crystallized, indicating modeling inaccuracies and forcing us to re-evaluate our strategy. To compensate for slight changes in the local backbone and side-chain environment, we subsequently designed on an ensemble of minimally perturbed protein backbones. Using this strategy, four of the seven designed proteins crystallized. By collecting diffraction data from multiple crystals per design and solving crystal structures, we found that the designed crystals improved the resolution modestly and in unpredictable ways, including altering the crystal space group. Post hoc, in silico analysis of the three observed space groups for SNase showed that the native space group was the lowest scoring for four of six variants (including the wild type), but that resolution did not correlate with crystal score, as it did in the preliminary results. Collectively, our results show that calculated crystal scores can correlate with reported resolution, but that the correlation is absent when the problem is inverted. This outcome suggests that more comprehensive modeling of the crystallographic state is necessary to design high-resolution protein crystals from poorly diffracting crystals.

Keywords:  Rosetta; protein crystallography; protein design; staphylococcal nuclease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31692475      PMCID: PMC6834074          DOI: 10.1107/S2059798319013226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol        ISSN: 2059-7983            Impact factor:   7.652


  51 in total

1.  Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction.

Authors:  Colin A Smith; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Reexamination of the Three-Dimensional Structure of the Small Subunit of RuBisCo from Higher Plants.

Authors:  S Knight; I Andersson; C I Brändén
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  A historical perspective on protein crystallization from 1840 to the present day.

Authors:  Richard Giegé
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.542

4.  PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta.

Authors:  Sidhartha Chaudhury; Sergey Lyskov; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Solving the structure of human H ferritin by genetically engineering intermolecular crystal contacts.

Authors:  D M Lawson; P J Artymiuk; S J Yewdall; J M Smith; J C Livingstone; A Treffry; A Luzzago; S Levi; P Arosio; G Cesareni
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Linking crystallographic model and data quality.

Authors:  P Andrew Karplus; Kay Diederichs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation.

Authors:  Christopher J Williams; Jeffrey J Headd; Nigel W Moriarty; Michael G Prisant; Lizbeth L Videau; Lindsay N Deis; Vishal Verma; Daniel A Keedy; Bradley J Hintze; Vincent B Chen; Swati Jain; Steven M Lewis; W Bryan Arendall; Jack Snoeyink; Paul D Adams; Simon C Lovell; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Understanding the physical properties that control protein crystallization by analysis of large-scale experimental data.

Authors:  W Nicholson Price; Yang Chen; Samuel K Handelman; Helen Neely; Philip Manor; Richard Karlin; Rajesh Nair; Jinfeng Liu; Michael Baran; John Everett; Saichiu N Tong; Farhad Forouhar; Swarup S Swaminathan; Thomas Acton; Rong Xiao; Joseph R Luft; Angela Lauricella; George T DeTitta; Burkhard Rost; Gaetano T Montelione; John F Hunt
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 9.  Scaling and assessment of data quality.

Authors:  Philip Evans
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2005-12-14

10.  A generic program for multistate protein design.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Ron Jacak; P Benjamin Stranges; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Redefining Protein Interfaces within Protein Single Crystals with DNA.

Authors:  Benjamin E Partridge; Peter H Winegar; Zhenyu Han; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 16.383

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.