Literature DB >> 24159206

Student and faculty perceptions of lecture recording in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum.

Lena M Maynor1, Ashleigh Landis Barrickman, Mary K Stamatakis, David P Elliott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe students' and faculty members' perceptions of the impact of lecture recording in a doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum.
METHODS: Second- and third-year pharmacy students and faculty members completed an anonymous survey instrument regarding their perceptions of lecture recording with 2 classroom lecture capture software programs, Camtasia Studio and Wimba Classroom.
RESULTS: Most students (82%) responded that Camtasia was very helpful and almost half (49%) responded that Wimba Classroom was helpful (p<0.001). Forty-six percent of the students reported being more likely to miss a class that was recorded; however, few students (10%) reported using recordings as a substitute for attending class. The most common concern of faculty members was decreased student attendance (27%).
CONCLUSION: Pharmacy students consider lecture recordings beneficial, and they use the recordings primarily to review the lecture. While faculty members reported concerns with decreased attendance, few students reported using recordings as an alternative to class attendance.

Keywords:  attendance; lecture capture; recording; technology

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24159206      PMCID: PMC3806949          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe778165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  10 in total

1.  To record or not to record?

Authors:  Frank Romanelli; Jeff Cain; Kelly M Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Evaluation of a lecture recording system in a medical curriculum.

Authors:  Thierry R H Bacro; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Timothy P Fitzharris
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Impact of online lecture-capture on student outcomes in a therapeutics course.

Authors:  Suzanne G Bollmeier; Philip J Wenger; Alicia B Forinash
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter?

Authors:  Susan Billings-Gagliardi; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet?

Authors:  Scott Cardall; Edward Krupat; Michael Ulrich
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Lecture halls without lectures--a proposal for medical education.

Authors:  Charles G Prober; Chip Heath
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Factors influencing pharmacy students' attendance decisions in large lectures.

Authors:  Salisa C Westrick; Kristen L Helms; Sharon K McDonough; Michelle L Breland
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Educational technology use among US colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Authors:  Michael S Monaghan; Jeff J Cain; Patrick M Malone; Tracy A Chapman; Ryan W Walters; David C Thompson; Steven T Riedl
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats [ISRCTN40455708.

Authors:  David J Solomon; Gary S Ferenchick; Heather S Laird-Fick; Kevin Kavanaugh
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  An analysis of lecture video utilization in undergraduate medical education: associations with performance in the courses.

Authors:  John A McNulty; Amy Hoyt; Gregory Gruener; Arcot Chandrasekhar; Baltazar Espiritu; Ron Price; Ross Naheedy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.463

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Considerations for Determining Perceived Benefits and Challenges of Student Organizations at Pharmacy School Satellite Campuses.

Authors:  Gina T Ayers
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  The Effect of Pharmacy Students' Attendance on Examination Performance in Two Sequential Active-Learning Pharmacotherapy Courses.

Authors:  Ashley Ta; Joshua J Neumiller; Anne P Kim; Connie M Remsberg; M David Gothard
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Effect of Live Attendance and Video Capture Viewing on Student Examination Performance.

Authors:  David Schnee; Tucker Ward; Eli Philips; Stefanos Torkos; Jenny Mullakary; Gary Tataronis; Erika Felix-Getzik
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Evaluate Factors That Influence PharmD Students' Intention to Attend Lectures.

Authors:  Erik Skoglund; Julianna Fernandez; Jeffrey T Sherer; Elizabeth A Coyle; Kevin W Garey; Marc L Fleming; Amelia K Sofjan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Relationships Between Remote Asynchronous Lectures and Summative Assessment Performance in four Pharmacotherapeutics Courses.

Authors:  Jordan Sedlacek; Paul M Boylan; Antonio Perry
Journal:  J Pharm Technol       Date:  2022-06-16

6.  Should Undergraduate Lectures be Compulsory? The Views of Dental and Medical Students from a UK University.

Authors:  Alaa Daud; Aaron Bagria; Kushal Shah; James Puryer
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-31

7.  The Relationship Between Method of Viewing Lectures, Course Ratings, and Course Timing.

Authors:  William B Burton; Terence P Ma; Martha S Grayson
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2017-07-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.