Literature DB >> 21088733

Impact of online lecture-capture on student outcomes in a therapeutics course.

Suzanne G Bollmeier1, Philip J Wenger, Alicia B Forinash.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the correlation between students accessing recorded lecture files (audio and slides) online and course grades and class attendance.
METHODS: Second professional year (of 6-year program) students in a therapeutics course had access to recorded online lectures for 72 hours following live lectures. The number and duration of lecture accessions were compared to final course grades and class attendance. Course grades were compared to those of a historical control group. At the end of the semester, students completed a brief survey instrument regarding their use and perceptions of online lectures.
RESULTS: No correlation was found between final course grades and the number of lecture accessions (r = 0.0014) or total number of minutes lectures were viewed (r = 0.033), nor between class attendance and minutes viewed (r = 0.2158). Students with access to recorded lectures outperformed the historical control group on the final examination (p < 0.002). Seventy-two percent of students reported no influence of online files on class attendance.
CONCLUSIONS: Posting lectures online did not affect student outcomes, but students did score higher on the final examination.

Keywords:  Internet; lecture-capture; online; technology; therapeutics

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21088733      PMCID: PMC2972522          DOI: 10.5688/aj7407127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  2 in total

1.  Factors influencing pharmacy students' attendance decisions in large lectures.

Authors:  Salisa C Westrick; Kristen L Helms; Sharon K McDonough; Michelle L Breland
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  Roles of innovation in education delivery.

Authors:  Robert A Blouin; William H Riffee; Evan T Robinson; Diane E Beck; Charles Green; Pamela U Joyner; Adam M Persky; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.047

  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Perceptions of pharmacy students, faculty members, and administrators on the use of technology in the classroom.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Mary S Hayney; Wallace Marsh; Michael W Neville; Stephen O'Barr; Erin D Sheets; Larry D Calhoun
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Student and faculty perceptions of lecture recording in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum.

Authors:  Lena M Maynor; Ashleigh Landis Barrickman; Mary K Stamatakis; David P Elliott
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Student pharmacists' use and perceived impact of educational technologies.

Authors:  Scott K Stolte; Craig Richard; Ateequr Rahman; Robert S Kidd
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Lecture-capture: the early Qatar experience.

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur; Peter Jewesson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Student and faculty member perspectives on lecture capture in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Jon-Paul Marchand; Marion L Pearson; Simon P Albon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 6.  Effectiveness of educational technology to improve patient care in pharmacy curricula.

Authors:  Michael A Smith; Neal Benedict
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Effect of Live Attendance and Video Capture Viewing on Student Examination Performance.

Authors:  David Schnee; Tucker Ward; Eli Philips; Stefanos Torkos; Jenny Mullakary; Gary Tataronis; Erika Felix-Getzik
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  No apparent association between lecture attendance or accessing lecture recordings and academic outcomes in a medical laboratory science course.

Authors:  Sheila Anne Doggrell
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.