Literature DB >> 17895696

Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter?

Susan Billings-Gagliardi1, Kathleen M Mazor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study explored whether first-year medical students make deliberate decisions about attending nonrequired lectures. If so, it sought to identify factors that influence these decisions, specifically addressing the potential impact of electronic materials.
METHOD: Medical students who completed first-year studies between 2004 and 2006 responded to an open-ended survey question about their own lecture-attendance decisions. Responses were coded to capture major themes. Students' ratings of the electronic materials were also examined.
RESULTS: Most respondents made deliberate attendance decisions. Decisions were influenced by previous experiences with the lecturer, predictions of what would occur during the session itself, personal learning preferences, and learning needs at that particular time, with the overriding goal of maximizing learning. Access to electronic materials did not influence students' choices.
CONCLUSIONS: Fears that the increasing availability of technology-enhanced educational materials has a negative impact on lecture attendance seem unfounded.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17895696     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31813e651e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  13 in total

1.  Pharmacy student absenteeism and academic performance.

Authors:  Levita Hidayat; Sandeep Vansal; Esther Kim; Maureen Sullivan; Rebecca Salbu
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Exploring student preferences with a Q-sort: the development of an individualized renal physiology curriculum.

Authors:  John K Roberts; Charles W Hargett; Alisa Nagler; Emma Jakoi; Ruediger W Lehrich
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Student and faculty perceptions of lecture recording in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum.

Authors:  Lena M Maynor; Ashleigh Landis Barrickman; Mary K Stamatakis; David P Elliott
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Evaluate Factors That Influence PharmD Students' Intention to Attend Lectures.

Authors:  Erik Skoglund; Julianna Fernandez; Jeffrey T Sherer; Elizabeth A Coyle; Kevin W Garey; Marc L Fleming; Amelia K Sofjan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Relationship of Medical Student Lecture Attendance with Course, Clerkship, and Licensing Exam Scores.

Authors:  Leonie M Hoyo; Connie Y Yang; Allison R Larson
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-07-06

6.  Do Medical Students' Learning Styles and Approaches Explain Their Views and Behavior Regarding Lecture Attendance?

Authors:  Ali El Mokahal; Ali Ahmad; Joseph R Habib; Ali A Nasrallah; George Francis; Ramzi Sabra; Nathalie K Zgheib
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-07-30

7.  Medical student attitudes toward kidney physiology and nephrology: a qualitative study.

Authors:  John K Roberts; Matthew A Sparks; Ruediger W Lehrich
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.606

8.  Ophthalmology Education in COVID-19: A Remote Elective for Medical Students.

Authors:  Sarah N DeVaro; Ogul E Uner; Yousuf M Khalifa; Emily B Graubart
Journal:  J Acad Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-10

9.  An analysis of lecture video utilization in undergraduate medical education: associations with performance in the courses.

Authors:  John A McNulty; Amy Hoyt; Gregory Gruener; Arcot Chandrasekhar; Baltazar Espiritu; Ron Price; Ross Naheedy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  The strategic use of lecture recordings to facilitate an active and self-directed learning approach.

Authors:  Luminica Topale
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.