Literature DB >> 24131605

The advantage of knowing the talker.

Pamela Souza1, Namita Gehani, Richard Wright, Daniel McCloy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many audiologists have observed a situation where a patient appears to understand something spoken by his or her spouse or a close friend but not the same information spoken by a stranger. However, it is not clear whether this observation reflects choice of communication strategy or a true benefit derived from the talker's voice.
PURPOSE: The current study measured the benefits of long-term talker familiarity for older individuals with hearing impairment in a variety of listening situations. RESEARCH
DESIGN: In Experiment 1, we measured speech recognition with familiar and unfamiliar voices when the difficulty level was manipulated by varying levels of a speech-shaped background noise. In Experiment 2, we measured the benefit of a familiar voice when the background noise was other speech (informational masking). STUDY SAMPLE: A group of 31 older listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss participated in the study. Fifteen of the participants served as talkers and 16 as listeners. In each case, the talker-listener pair for the familiar condition represented a close, long-term relationship (spouse or close friend). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Speech-recognition scores were compared using controlled stimuli (low-context sentences) recorded by the study talkers. The sentences were presented in quiet and in two levels of speech-spectrum noise (Experiment 1) as well as in multitalker babble (Experiment 2). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare performance between the familiar and unfamiliar talkers, within and across conditions.
RESULTS: Listeners performed better when speech was produced by a talker familiar to them, whether that talker was in a quiet or noisy environment. The advantage of the familiar talker was greater in a more adverse listening situation (i.e., in the highest level of background noise) but was similar for speech-spectrum noise and multitalker babble.
CONCLUSIONS: The present data support a frequent clinical observation: listeners can understand their spouse better than a stranger. This effect was present for all our participants and occurred under strictly controlled conditions in which the only possible cue was the voice itself, rather than under normal communicative conditions where listener accommodation strategies on the part of the talker may confound the measurable benefit. The magnitude of the effect was larger than shown for short-term familiarity in previous work. This suggests that older listeners with hearing loss who inherently operate under deficient auditory conditions can benefit from experience with the voice characteristics of a long-term communication partner over many years of a relationship. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24131605      PMCID: PMC3801269          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.24.8.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  43 in total

1.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Authors:  Sonya M Sheffert; David B Pisoni; Jennifer M Fellowes; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Patti Adank; Bronwen G Evans; Jane Stuart-Smith; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew H Burk; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-04

7.  Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST).

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; C Gilmore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Human voice recognition depends on language ability.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Stephanie N Del Tufo; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Should significant others be encouraged to join adult group audiologic rehabilitation classes?

Authors:  Jill E Preminger
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding.

Authors:  Stuart Rosen; Pamela Souza; Caroline Ekelund; Arooj A Majeed
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  16 in total

1.  Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.

Authors:  James S Magnuson; Howard C Nusbaum; Reiko Akahane-Yamada; David Saltzman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Julie Case; Scott Seyfarth; Susannah V Levi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Short-term implicit voice-learning leads to a Familiar Talker Advantage: The role of encoding specificity.

Authors:  Julie Case; Scott Seyfarth; Susannah V Levi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Talker identification: Effects of masking, hearing loss, and age.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Christine R Mason; Elin Roverud; Tyler K Perrachione; Gerald Kidd; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory Training With Frequent Communication Partners.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Mitchell Sommers; Joe Barcroft
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Christin Ray; Kara J Vasil; David B Pisoni; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Richard A Wright; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  GPS predicts stability of listening environment characteristics in one location over time among older hearing aid users.

Authors:  Erik J Jorgensen; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Helin Hernandez; Jacob Oleson; Yu-Hsiang Wu
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.437

10.  I know that voice! Mothers' voices influence children's perceptions of emotional intensity.

Authors:  Tawni B Stoop; Peter M Moriarty; Rachel Wolf; Rick O Gilmore; Koraly Perez-Edgar; K Suzanne Scherf; Michelle C Vigeant; Pamela M Cole
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2020-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.