Literature DB >> 26529902

Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.

Daniel R McCloy, Richard A Wright, Pamela E Souza.   

Abstract

This study investigates the relative effects of talker-specific variation and dialect-based variation on speech intelligibility. Listeners from two dialects of American English performed speech-in-noise tasks with sentences spoken by talkers of each dialect. An initial statistical model showed no significant effects for either talker or listener dialect group, and no interaction. However, a mixed-effects regression model including several acoustic measures of the talker's speech revealed a subtle effect of talker dialect once the various acoustic dimensions were accounted for. Results are discussed in relation to other recent studies of cross-dialect intelligibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26529902      PMCID: PMC4634571          DOI: 10.1177/0023830914559234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  23 in total

1.  Multiple-choice intelligibility tests.

Authors:  J W BLACK
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1957-06

2.  Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni; Kenneth de Jong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual similarity of regional dialects of American English.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; Susannah V Levi; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Measurement and prediction of speech and noise levels and the Lombard effect in eating establishments.

Authors:  Murray Hodgson; Gavin Steininger; Zohreh Razavi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists.

Authors:  S D Goldinger; D B Pisoni; J S Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Patti Adank; Bronwen G Evans; Jane Stuart-Smith; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Free classification of regional dialects of American English.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2007-07

8.  Influence of the speaker and other factors affecting speech intelligibility.

Authors:  J D Hood; J P Poole
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1980

9.  Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children.

Authors:  Valerie Hazan; Duncan Markham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Vowel space characteristics and vowel identification accuracy.

Authors:  Amy T Neel
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  10 in total

1.  Are there sex effects for speech intelligibility in American English? Examining the influence of talker, listener, and methodology.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Dane B Whittaker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Intelligibility and Clarity of Reverberant Speech: Effects of Wide Dynamic Range Compression Release Time and Working Memory.

Authors:  Paul N Reinhart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Talker Differences in Clear and Conversational Speech: Perceived Sentence Clarity for Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Shae D Morgan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  On Older Listeners' Ability to Perceive Dynamic Pitch.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Richard Wright; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Comparing non-native and native speech: Are L2 productions more variable?

Authors:  Xin Xie; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Interactions Between Digital Noise Reduction and Reverberation: Acoustic and Behavioral Effects.

Authors:  Paul Reinhart; Pavel Zahorik; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Dyslexia Limits the Ability to Categorize Talker Dialect.

Authors:  Gayle Beam Long; Robert Allen Fox; Ewa Jacewicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Single Word Intelligibility of Individuals with Parkinson's Disease in Noise: Pre-Specified Secondary Outcome Variables from a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) Comparing Two Intensive Speech Treatments (LSVT LOUD vs. LSVT ARTIC).

Authors:  Geralyn Schulz; Angela Halpern; Jennifer Spielman; Lorraine Ramig; Ira Panzer; Alan Sharpley; Katherine Freeman
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-06-27

9.  Written standard sentence materials convey social information.

Authors:  Alayo Tripp; Benjamin Munson
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-12-21

10.  The Role of Acoustic Distance and Sociolinguistic Knowledge in Dialect Identification.

Authors:  Hanna Ruch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.