Literature DB >> 27567016

Auditory Training With Frequent Communication Partners.

Nancy Tye-Murray, Brent Spehar, Mitchell Sommers, Joe Barcroft.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Individuals with hearing loss engage in auditory training to improve their speech recognition. They typically practice listening to utterances spoken by unfamiliar talkers but never to utterances spoken by their most frequent communication partner (FCP)-speech they most likely desire to recognize-under the assumption that familiarity with the FCP's speech limits potential gains. This study determined whether auditory training with the speech of an individual's FCP, in this case their spouse, would lead to enhanced recognition of their spouse's speech.
METHOD: Ten couples completed a 6-week computerized auditory training program in which the spouse recorded the stimuli and the participant (partner with hearing loss) completed auditory training that presented recordings of their spouse.
RESULTS: Training led participants to better discriminate their FCP's speech. Responses on the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (Dillon, James, & Ginis, 1997) indicated subjectively that training reduced participants' communication difficulties. Peformance on a word identification task did not change.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that auditory training might improve the ability of older participants with hearing loss to recognize the speech of their spouse and might improve communication interactions between couples. The results support a task-appropriate processing framework of learning, which assumes that human learning depends on the degree of similarity between training tasks and desired outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27567016      PMCID: PMC5280067          DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  9 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Robert Sweetow; Catherine V Palmer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Matthew H Burk; Larry E Humes; Nathan E Amos; Lauren E Strauser
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The need for and development of an adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Program.

Authors:  Robert W Sweetow; Jennifer Henderson Sabes
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids.

Authors:  H Dillon; A James; J Ginis
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Tailoring auditory training to patient needs with single and multiple talkers: transfer-appropriate gains on a four-choice discrimination test.

Authors:  Joe Barcroft; Mitchell S Sommers; Nancy Tye-Murray; Elizabeth Mauzé; Catherine Schroy; Brent Spehar
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Using patient perceptions of relative benefit and enjoyment to assess auditory training.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell S Sommers; Elizabeth Mauzé; Catherine Schroy; Joe Barcroft; Brent Spehar
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Auditory-visual discourse comprehension by older and young adults in favorable and unfavorable conditions.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers; Brent Spehar; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale; Nathan S Rose
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  The advantage of knowing the talker.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Namita Gehani; Richard Wright; Daniel McCloy
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 9.  Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Helen Henshaw; Melanie A Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  A talker-independent deep learning algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in reverberant competing talker conditions.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Eric M Johnson; Masood Delfarah; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  New Directions for Auditory Training: Introduction.

Authors:  Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Task- and Talker-Specific Gains in Auditory Training.

Authors:  Joe Barcroft; Brent Spehar; Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Auditory Training for Adults Who Have Hearing Loss: A Comparison of Spaced Versus Massed Practice Schedules.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Joe Barcroft; Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Guidance on Providing Patient-Centered Care.

Authors:  Kris English
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2022-07-26

6.  Auditory Perceptual Exercises in Adults Adapting to the Use of Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Hanin Karah; Hanin Karawani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-18

7.  Teaching Children With Hearing Loss to Recognize Speech: Gains Made With Computer-Based Auditory and/or Speechreading Training.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Mitchell Sommers; Elizabeth Mauzé; Joe Barcroft; Heather Grantham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.