Literature DB >> 24116424

Phase effects on the masking of speech by harmonic complexes: variations with level.

Tim Green1, Stuart Rosen.   

Abstract

Speech reception thresholds were obtained in normally hearing listeners for sentence targets masked by harmonic complexes constructed with different phase relationships. Maskers had either a constant fundamental frequency (F0), or had F0 changing over time, following a pitch contour extracted from natural speech. The median F0 of the target speech was very similar to that of the maskers. In experiment 1 differences in the masking produced by Schroeder positive and Schroeder negative phase complexes were small (around 1.5 dB) for moderate levels [60 dB sound pressure level (SPL)], but increased to around 6 dB for maskers at 80 dB SPL. Phase effects were typically around 1.5 dB larger for maskers that had naturally varying F0 contours than for maskers with constant F0. Experiment 2 showed that shaping the long-term spectrum of the maskers to match the target speech had no effect. Experiment 3 included additional phase relationships at moderate levels and found no effect of phase. Therefore, the phase relationship within harmonic complexes appears to have only minor effects on masking effectiveness, at least at moderate levels, and when targets and maskers are in the same F0 range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24116424      PMCID: PMC3857708          DOI: 10.1121/1.4820899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart; B D Simpson; M A Ericson; K R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Basilar-membrane responses to multicomponent (Schroeder-phase) signals: understanding intensity effects.

Authors:  Van Summers; Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Basilar membrane nonlinearity and its influence on auditory nerve rate-intensity functions.

Authors:  G K Yates
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.

Authors:  J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Phase effects in masking related to dispersion in the inner ear. II. Masking period patterns of short targets.

Authors:  A Kohlrausch; A Sander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  V Summers; M R Leek
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Updated parameters and expanded simulation options for a model of the auditory periphery.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.

Authors:  R Plomp; A M Mimpen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people.

Authors:  R W Peters; B C Moore; T Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.840

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: detection of bands of speech-shaped noise.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech recognition against harmonic and inharmonic complexes: spectral dips and periodicity.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.