Literature DB >> 22087914

Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.

Mickael L D Deroche1, John F Culling.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated listeners' ability to use a difference of two semitones in fundamental frequency (F0) to segregate a target voice from harmonic complex tones, with speech-like spectral profiles. Masker partials were in random phase (experiment 1) or in sine phase (experiment 2) and stimuli were presented over headphones. Target's and masker's harmonicity were each distorted by F0 modulation and reverberation. The F0 of each source was manipulated (monotonized or modulated by 2 semitones at 5 Hz) factorially. In addition, all sources were presented from the same location in a virtual room with controlled reverberation, assigned factorially to each source. In both experiments, speech reception thresholds increased by about 2 dB when the F0 of the masker was modulated and increased by about 6 dB when, in addition to F0 modulation, the masker was reverberant. Masker partial phases did not influence the results. The results suggest that F0-segregation relies upon the masker's harmonicity, which is disrupted by rapid modulation. This effect is compounded by reverberation. In addition, F0-segregation was found to be independent of the depth of masker envelope modulations.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22087914     DOI: 10.1121/1.3643812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  A harmonic-cancellation-based model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker.

Authors:  Luna Prud'homme; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Peter A Wasiuk; Mathieu Lavandier; Emily Buss; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Roles of the target and masker fundamental frequencies in voice segregation.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech recognition against harmonic and inharmonic complexes: spectral dips and periodicity.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: speech recognition.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Phase effects on the masking of speech by harmonic complexes: variations with level.

Authors:  Tim Green; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Reverberation impairs brainstem temporal representations of voiced vowel sounds: challenging "periodicity-tagged" segregation of competing speech in rooms.

Authors:  Mark Sayles; Arkadiusz Stasiak; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-12

8.  The Auditory-Brainstem Response to Continuous, Non-repetitive Speech Is Modulated by the Speech Envelope and Reflects Speech Processing.

Authors:  Chagit S Reichenbach; Chananel Braiman; Nicholas D Schiff; A J Hudspeth; Tobias Reichenbach
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Speech in noise perception improved by training fine auditory discrimination: far and applicable transfer of perceptual learning.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Tingting Yan; Ting Huang; Xiaoli Li; Yu-Xuan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding.

Authors:  Stuart Rosen; Pamela Souza; Caroline Ekelund; Arooj A Majeed
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.