Literature DB >> 2076968

Basilar membrane nonlinearity and its influence on auditory nerve rate-intensity functions.

G K Yates1.   

Abstract

Previous papers have shown that the shapes of rate-intensity functions of auditory nerve fibres vary with spontaneous rate (Sachs and Abbas 1974; Sachs et al. 1989; Winter et al. 1990; Yates et al. 1990), and that the variation is due to the nonlinear properties of the basilar membrane. This paper examines the basilar membrane nonlinearity and provides a semi-quantitative explanation for it in terms of previous models (Zwicker 1979; Patuzzi et al. 1989) and an analogue model. It thereby provides explanations for the shapes of the basilar membrane input-output curves and for the way in which they vary with trauma. The shapes of the neural rate-intensity functions are quantified and shown to be consistent with the low-threshold data of Geisler et al. (1985). Several nonlinear properties of the cochlea, such as recruitment, are also interpreted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2076968     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90041-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  24 in total

1.  Coding of sound pressure level in the barn owl's auditory nerve.

Authors:  C Köppl; G Yates
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effect of human auditory efferent feedback on cochlear gain and compression.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Vit Drga; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

4.  The effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral broadband noise on the mid-level hump in intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Threshold and beyond: modeling the intensity dependence of auditory responses.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-14

6.  Auditory brainstem response at the detection limit.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner; Annemarie Seither-Preisler
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-08-14

7.  Neural coding of sound frequency by cricket auditory receptors.

Authors:  K Imaizumi; G S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Harmonic distortion on the basilar membrane in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea.

Authors:  N P Cooper
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: detection of bands of speech-shaped noise.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.