Literature DB >> 24101435

Evaluation of a novel electronic genetic screening and clinical decision support tool in prenatal clinical settings.

Emily A Edelman1, Bruce K Lin, Teresa Doksum, Brian Drohan, Vaughn Edelson, Siobhan M Dolan, Kevin Hughes, James O'Leary, Lisa Vasquez, Sara Copeland, Shelley L Galvin, Nicole DeGroat, Setul Pardanani, W Gregory Feero, Claire Adams, Renee Jones, Joan Scott.   

Abstract

"The Pregnancy and Health Profile" (PHP) is a free prenatal genetic screening and clinical decision support (CDS) software tool for prenatal providers. PHP collects family health history (FHH) during intake and provides point-of-care risk assessment for providers and education for patients. This pilot study evaluated patient and provider responses to PHP and effects of using PHP in practice. PHP was implemented in four clinics. Surveys assessed provider confidence and knowledge and patient and provider satisfaction with PHP. Data on the implementation process were obtained through semi-structured interviews with administrators. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using Chi square test, Fisher's exact test, paired t tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Open-ended survey questions and interviews were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. Of the 83% (513/618) of patients that provided feedback, 97% felt PHP was easy to use and 98% easy to understand. Thirty percent (21/71) of participating physicians completed both pre- and post-implementation feedback surveys [13 obstetricians (OBs) and 8 family medicine physicians (FPs)]. Confidence in managing genetic risks significantly improved for OBs on 2/6 measures (p values ≤0.001) but not for FPs. Physician knowledge did not significantly change. Providers reported value in added patient engagement and reported mixed feedback about the CDS report. We identified key steps, resources, and staff support required to implement PHP in a clinical setting. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report on the integration of patient-completed, electronically captured and CDS-enabled FHH software into primary prenatal practice. PHP is acceptable to patients and providers. Key to successful implementation in the future will be customization options and interoperability with electronic health records.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24101435     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-013-1358-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  30 in total

1.  Confidence of primary care physicians in their ability to carry out basic medical genetic tasks-a European survey in five countries-Part 1.

Authors:  Irmgard Nippert; Hilary J Harris; Claire Julian-Reynier; Ulf Kristoffersson; Leo P Ten Kate; Elizabeth Anionwu; Caroline Benjamin; Kirsty Challen; Jörg Schmidtke; R Peter Nippert; Rodney Harris
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-12-04

2.  Inherited predisposition to spontaneous preterm delivery.

Authors:  Sohinee Bhattacharya; Edwin Amalraj Raja; Eider Ruiz Mirazo; Doris M Campbell; Amanda J Lee; Jane E Norman; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Nidhi R Shah; Andrew C Seger; Diane L Seger; Julie M Fiskio; Gilad J Kuperman; Barry Blumenfeld; Elaine G Recklet; David W Bates; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Efficacy of a touchscreen computer based family cancer history questionnaire and subsequent cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  J Westman; H Hampel; T Bradley
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Committee Opinion No. 478: Family history as a risk assessment tool.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction.

Authors:  James D Ralston; David Carrell; Robert Reid; Melissa Anderson; Maureena Moran; James Hereford
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.

Authors:  Nerissa S Bauer; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Validation of My Family Health Portrait for six common heritable conditions.

Authors:  Flavia M Facio; W Gregory Feero; Amy Linn; Neal Oden; Kandamurugu Manickam; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Clinical utility of family history for cancer screening and referral in primary care: a report from the Family Healthware Impact Trial.

Authors:  Wendy S Rubinstein; Louise S Acheson; Suzanne M O'Neill; Mack T Ruffin; Catharine Wang; Jennifer L Beaumont; Nan Rothrock
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  The family history: the first genetic test, and still useful after all those years?

Authors:  Reed E Pyeritz
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 2.  Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Jill Fonda Allen; Katie Stoll; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  An approach to improve the care of mid-life women through the implementation of a Women's Health Assessment Tool/Clinical Decision Support toolkit.

Authors:  Terry M Silvestrin; Anna W Steenrod; Karin S Coyne; David E Gross; Canan B Esinduy; Angela B Kodsi; Gayle J Slifka; Lucy Abraham; Anna L Araiza; Andrew G Bushmakin; Xuemei Luo
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-24

4.  Physicians' strategies for using family history data: having the data is not the same as using the data.

Authors:  Peter Taber; Parveen Ghani; Joshua D Schiffman; Wendy Kohlmann; Rachel Hess; Valli Chidambaram; Kensaku Kawamoto; Rosalie G Waller; Damian Borbolla; Guilherme Del Fiol; Charlene Weir
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-10-08

5.  Identification and Impact Analysis of Family History of Psychiatric Disorder in Mood Disorder Patients With Pretrained Language Model.

Authors:  Cheng Wan; Xuewen Ge; Junjie Wang; Xin Zhang; Yun Yu; Jie Hu; Yun Liu; Hui Ma
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.435

6.  Formative evaluation of clinician experience with integrating family history-based clinical decision support into clinical practice.

Authors:  Megan Doerr; Emily Edelman; Emily Gabitzsch; Charis Eng; Kathryn Teng
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2014-03-26

7.  What maximizes the effectiveness and implementation of technology-based interventions to support healthcare professional practice? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  C Keyworth; J Hart; C J Armitage; M P Tully
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Primary-care providers' perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Natalie A Mikat-Stevens; Ingrid A Larson; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 8.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.