Literature DB >> 27558508

An approach to improve the care of mid-life women through the implementation of a Women's Health Assessment Tool/Clinical Decision Support toolkit.

Terry M Silvestrin1, Anna W Steenrod2, Karin S Coyne3, David E Gross4, Canan B Esinduy4, Angela B Kodsi4, Gayle J Slifka4, Lucy Abraham4, Anna L Araiza4, Andrew G Bushmakin4, Xuemei Luo4.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to describe the implementation process of the Women's Health Assessment Tool/Clinical Decision Support toolkit and summarize patients' and clinicians' perceptions of the toolkit. The Women's Health Assessment Tool/Clinical Decision Support toolkit was piloted at three clinical sites over a 4-month period in Washington State to evaluate health outcomes among mid-life women. The implementation involved a multistep process and engagement of multiple stakeholders over 18 months. Two-thirds of patients (n = 76/110) and clinicians (n = 8/12) participating in pilot completed feedback surveys; five clinicians participated in qualitative interviews. Most patients felt more prepared for their annual visit (69.7%) and that quality of care improved (68.4%) while clinicians reported streamlined patient visits and improved communication with patients. The Women's Health Assessment Tool/Clinical Decision Support toolkit offers a unique approach to introduce and address some of the key health issues that affect mid-life women.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Women’s Health Assessment Tool; clinical decision support; patient satisfaction; primary care; quality improvement; women’s health

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27558508      PMCID: PMC5373265          DOI: 10.1177/1745505716664742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)        ISSN: 1745-5057


  30 in total

1.  Why don't clinicians engage with quality improvement?

Authors:  Huw Davies; Alison Powell; Rosemary Rushmer
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2007-07

2.  Well-woman visits: guidance and monitoring are key in this turning point for women's health.

Authors:  Therese Fitzgerald; Amy Glynn; Karen Davenport; Judith Waxman; Paula A Johnson
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

3.  Using an Internet comanagement module to improve the quality of chronic disease care.

Authors:  Harold I Goldberg; James D Ralston; Irl B Hirsch; James I Hoath; Kazi I Ahmed
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Saf       Date:  2003-09

4.  Development and validation of a 6-item version of the female sexual function index (FSFI) as a diagnostic tool for female sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  Andrea M Isidori; Carlotta Pozza; Katherine Esposito; Dario Giugliano; Susanna Morano; Linda Vignozzi; Giovanni Corona; Andrea Lenzi; Emmanuele A Jannini
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Evaluation of a novel electronic genetic screening and clinical decision support tool in prenatal clinical settings.

Authors:  Emily A Edelman; Bruce K Lin; Teresa Doksum; Brian Drohan; Vaughn Edelson; Siobhan M Dolan; Kevin Hughes; James O'Leary; Lisa Vasquez; Sara Copeland; Shelley L Galvin; Nicole DeGroat; Setul Pardanani; W Gregory Feero; Claire Adams; Renee Jones; Joan Scott
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-07

Review 6.  Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maria B Boyce; John P Browne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Urinary incontinence prevalence: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Yashika Dooley; Kimberly Kenton; Guichan Cao; Amy Luke; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; Holly Kramer; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Evaluation of the effect of decision support on the efficiency of primary care providers in the outpatient practice.

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Ronald A Hankey; Lindsay K Decker; Stephen S Cha; Robert A Greenes; Hongfang Liu; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2014-08-25

9.  Evaluating the effect of a web-based quality improvement system with feedback and outreach visits on guideline concordance in the field of cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and study protocol.

Authors:  Mariëtte M van Engen-Verheul; Nicolette F de Keizer; Sabine N van der Veer; Hareld M C Kemps; Wilma J M Scholte op Reimer; Monique W M Jaspers; Niels Peek
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Impact of vulvovaginal health on postmenopausal women: a review of surveys on symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy.

Authors:  Sharon J Parish; Rossella E Nappi; Michael L Krychman; Susan Kellogg-Spadt; James A Simon; Jeffrey A Goldstein; Sheryl A Kingsberg
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-07-29
View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating the Effects of Symptom Monitoring on Menopausal Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Robin Andrews; Gabrielle Hale; Bev John; Deborah Lancastle
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2021-12-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.