Nerissa S Bauer1, Aaron E Carroll, Stephen M Downs. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Section of Children's Health Services Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Individual users' attitudes and opinions help predict successful adoption of health information technology (HIT) into practice; however, little is known about pediatric users' acceptance of HIT for medical decision-making at the point of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We wished to examine the attitudes and opinions of pediatric users' toward the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system, a computer decision support system linked to an electronic health record in four community pediatric clinics. Surveys were administered in 2011 and 2012 to all users to measure CHICA's acceptability and users' satisfaction with it. Free text comments were analyzed for themes to understand areas of potential technical refinement. RESULTS: 70 participants completed the survey in 2011 (100% response rate) and 64 of 66 (97% response rate) in 2012. Initially, satisfaction with CHICA was mixed. In general, users felt the system held promise; however various critiques reflected difficulties understanding integrated technical aspects of how CHICA worked, as well as concern with the format and wording on generated forms for families and users. In the subsequent year, users' ratings reflected improved satisfaction and acceptance. Comments also reflected a deeper understanding of the system's logic, often accompanied by suggestions on potential refinements to make CHICA more useful at the point of care. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric users appreciate the system's automation and enhancements that allow relevant and meaningful clinical data to be accessible at point of care. Understanding users' acceptability and satisfaction is critical for ongoing refinement of HIT to ensure successful adoption into practice.
OBJECTIVE: Individual users' attitudes and opinions help predict successful adoption of health information technology (HIT) into practice; however, little is known about pediatric users' acceptance of HIT for medical decision-making at the point of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We wished to examine the attitudes and opinions of pediatric users' toward the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system, a computer decision support system linked to an electronic health record in four community pediatric clinics. Surveys were administered in 2011 and 2012 to all users to measure CHICA's acceptability and users' satisfaction with it. Free text comments were analyzed for themes to understand areas of potential technical refinement. RESULTS: 70 participants completed the survey in 2011 (100% response rate) and 64 of 66 (97% response rate) in 2012. Initially, satisfaction with CHICA was mixed. In general, users felt the system held promise; however various critiques reflected difficulties understanding integrated technical aspects of how CHICA worked, as well as concern with the format and wording on generated forms for families and users. In the subsequent year, users' ratings reflected improved satisfaction and acceptance. Comments also reflected a deeper understanding of the system's logic, often accompanied by suggestions on potential refinements to make CHICA more useful at the point of care. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric users appreciate the system's automation and enhancements that allow relevant and meaningful clinical data to be accessible at point of care. Understanding users' acceptability and satisfaction is critical for ongoing refinement of HIT to ensure successful adoption into practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical guidelines; Computer-based decision support; Pediatrics; Primary care
Authors: Jeffery N Epstein; Joshua M Langberg; Philip K Lichtenstein; Rebecca Kolb; Mekibib Altaye; John O Simon Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Catherine M DesRoches; Eric G Campbell; Sowmya R Rao; Karen Donelan; Timothy G Ferris; Ashish Jha; Rainu Kaushal; Douglas E Levy; Sara Rosenbaum; Alexandra E Shields; David Blumenthal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexander G Fiks; Kenya F Hunter; A Russell Localio; Robert W Grundmeier; Tyra Bryant-Stephens; Anthony A Luberti; Louis M Bell; Evaline A Alessandrini Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Aaron E Carroll; Paul G Biondich; Vibha Anand; Tamara M Dugan; Meena E Sheley; Shawn Z Xu; Stephen M Downs Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: John V Lavigne; Mina K Dulcan; Susan A LeBailly; Helen J Binns; Thomas K Cummins; Poonam Jha Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-06-13 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Alexander G Fiks; Robert W Grundmeier; Lisa M Biggs; A Russell Localio; Evaline A Alessandrini Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Tamara S Hannon; Tamara M Dugan; Chandan K Saha; Steven J McKee; Stephen M Downs; Aaron E Carroll Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Kristy B Arbogast; Allison E Curry; Kristina B Metzger; Ronni S Kessler; Jeneita M Bell; Juliet Haarbauer-Krupa; Mark R Zonfrillo; Matthew J Breiding; Christina L Master Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Randall W Grout; Erika R Cheng; Aaron E Carroll; Nerissa S Bauer; Stephen M Downs Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Emily A Edelman; Bruce K Lin; Teresa Doksum; Brian Drohan; Vaughn Edelson; Siobhan M Dolan; Kevin Hughes; James O'Leary; Lisa Vasquez; Sara Copeland; Shelley L Galvin; Nicole DeGroat; Setul Pardanani; W Gregory Feero; Claire Adams; Renee Jones; Joan Scott Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2014-07