Literature DB >> 25210938

Primary-care providers' perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature.

Natalie A Mikat-Stevens1, Ingrid A Larson2, Beth A Tarini3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to systematically review the literature to identify primary-care providers' perceived barriers against provision of genetics services.
METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and ERIC using key and Boolean term combinations for articles published from 2001 to 2012 that met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Specific barriers were identified and aggregated into categories based on topic similarity. These categories were then grouped into themes.
RESULTS: Of the 4,174 citations identified by the search, 38 publications met inclusion criteria. There were 311 unique barriers that were classified into 38 categories across 4 themes: knowledge and skills; ethical, legal, and social implications; health-care systems; and scientific evidence. Barriers most frequently mentioned by primary-care providers included a lack of knowledge about genetics and genetic risk assessment, concern for patient anxiety, a lack of access to genetics, and a lack of time.
CONCLUSION: Although studies reported that primary-care providers perceive genetics as being important, barriers to the integration of genetics medicine into routine patient care were identified. The promotion of practical guidelines, point-of-care risk assessment tools, tailored educational tools, and other systems-level strategies will assist primary-care providers in providing genetics services for their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25210938     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  60 in total

1.  General practitioners and predictive genetic testing for late-onset diseases in Flanders: what are their opinions and do they want to be involved?

Authors:  M Welkenhuysen; G Evers-Kiebooms
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2002

2.  How should preconceptional cystic fibrosis carrier screening be provided? Opinions of potential providers and the target population.

Authors:  Francis A M Poppelaars; Lidewij Henneman; Herman J Adèr; Martina C Cornel; Rosella P M G Hermens; Gerrit van der Wal; Leo P ten Kate
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2003

3.  A qualitative study of GPs' views on modern genetics.

Authors:  Laurence Bathurst; Qi Rong Huang
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2006-06

4.  The current and future state of pharmacogenomics medical education in the USA.

Authors:  Tracey J Nickola; James S Green; Arthur F Harralson; Travis J O'Brien
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Physician and staff perceptions of barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Clarenda M Phillips; Crystal Jenkins; Gretchen Norling; Carol White; Todd Jenkins; Debra Armstrong; Joe Petrik; Amy Steinkuhl; Regina Washington; Mark Dignan
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.302

6.  Patients' and professionals' opinions of services for people at an increased risk of colorectal cancer: an exploratory qualitative study.

Authors:  Tamar Stermer; Shirley Hodgson; Fred Kavalier; Sally Watts; Roger Jones
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  US physicians' attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  A N Freedman; L Wideroff; L Olson; W Davis; C Klabunde; K P Srinath; B B Reeve; R T Croyle; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives.

Authors:  Elisa Jf Houwink; Scheltus J van Luijk; Lidewij Henneman; Cees van der Vleuten; Geert Jan Dinant; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Personalised medicine in Canada: a survey of adoption and practice in oncology, cardiology and family medicine.

Authors:  Katherine Bonter; Clarissa Desjardins; Nathan Currier; Jason Pun; Fredrick D Ashbury
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Swiss primary care physicians' knowledge, attitudes and perception towards genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Gabriella Pichert; Daniel Dietrich; Peter Moosmann; Marcel Zwahlen; Rolf Arno Stahel; André-Pascal Sappino
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.446

View more
  83 in total

1.  A comparative study of patients' perceptions of genetic and genomic medicine services in California and Malaysia.

Authors:  Emily Qian; Meow-Keong Thong; Pamela Flodman; Jay Gargus
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-12-03

2.  Trust, Precision Medicine Research, and Equitable Participation of Underserved Populations.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Shawneequa Callier; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Elizabeth G Cohn
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 3.  First Responder to Genomic Information: A Guide for Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Primary care providers' use of pharmacist support for delivery of pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Jivan Moaddeb; Nancy Allen LaPointe; Alex Cho; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Survey of family history taking and genetic testing in pediatric practice.

Authors:  Robert A Saul; Tracy Trotter; Kerry Sease; Beth Tarini
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-01-07

Review 6.  Physician preparedness for big genomic data: a review of genomic medicine education initiatives in the United States.

Authors:  Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich; Cynthia Cheung; Jess Mandel; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Primary care providers' experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Tutsirai Makuwaza; Donna P Manca; Nicolette Sopcak; Joanne A Permaul; Mary Ann O'Brien; Ruth Heisey; Elizabeth A Eisenhauer; Julie Easley; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Baukje Miedema; Sandhya Pruthi; Carol Sawka; Nancy Schneider; Jonathan Sussman; Robin Urquhart; Catarina Versaevel; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Why Is Cancer Genetic Counseling Underutilized by Women Identified as at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer? Patient Perceptions of Barriers Following a Referral Letter.

Authors:  Alyssa Kne; Heather Zierhut; Shari Baldinger; Karen K Swenson; Pamela Mink; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Michaela L Tsai
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Sarah Patton; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann; June C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Implementing genetic education in primary care: the Gen-Equip programme.

Authors:  Milena Paneque; Martina C Cornel; Vaclava Curtisova; Elisa Houwink; Leigh Jackson; Alastair Kent; Peter Lunt; Milan Macek; Vigdis Stefansdottir; Daniela Turchetti; Heather Skirton
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.