Shilpa N Bhupathiraju1, Nicole M Wedick, An Pan, JoAnn E Manson, Kathyrn M Rexrode, Walter C Willett, Eric B Rimm, Frank B Hu. 1. Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (SNB, NMW, WCW, and FBH); Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health and Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (AP); the Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (JEM and KMR); the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (JEM, WCW, EBR, and FBH); and the Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (WCW, EBR, and FBH).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dietary guidelines recommend increasing fruit and vegetable intake and, most recently, have also suggested increasing variety. OBJECTIVE: We prospectively examined the independent roles of quantity and variety in fruit and vegetable intake in relation to incident coronary heart disease (CHD). DESIGN: We prospectively followed 71,141 women from the Nurses' Health Study (1984-2008) and 42,135 men from the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (1986-2008) who were free of diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer at baseline. Diet was assessed by using a validated questionnaire and updated every 4 y. Variety was defined as the number of unique fruit and vegetables consumed at least once per week. Potatoes, legumes, and fruit juices were not included in our definition of fruit and vegetables. RESULTS: During follow-up, we documented 2582 CHD cases in women and 3607 cases in men. In multivariable analyses, after adjustment for dietary and nondietary covariates, those in the highest quintile of fruit and vegetable intake had a 17% lower risk (95% CI: 9%, 24%) of CHD. A higher consumption of citrus fruit, green leafy vegetables, and β-carotene- and vitamin C-rich fruit and vegetables was associated with a lower CHD risk. Conversely, quantity-adjusted variety was not associated with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that absolute quantity, rather than variety, in fruit and vegetable intake is associated with a significantly lower risk of CHD. Nevertheless, consumption of specific fruit and vegetable subgroups was associated with a lower CHD risk.
BACKGROUND: Dietary guidelines recommend increasing fruit and vegetable intake and, most recently, have also suggested increasing variety. OBJECTIVE: We prospectively examined the independent roles of quantity and variety in fruit and vegetable intake in relation to incident coronary heart disease (CHD). DESIGN: We prospectively followed 71,141 women from the Nurses' Health Study (1984-2008) and 42,135 men from the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (1986-2008) who were free of diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer at baseline. Diet was assessed by using a validated questionnaire and updated every 4 y. Variety was defined as the number of unique fruit and vegetables consumed at least once per week. Potatoes, legumes, and fruit juices were not included in our definition of fruit and vegetables. RESULTS: During follow-up, we documented 2582 CHD cases in women and 3607 cases in men. In multivariable analyses, after adjustment for dietary and nondietary covariates, those in the highest quintile of fruit and vegetable intake had a 17% lower risk (95% CI: 9%, 24%) of CHD. A higher consumption of citrus fruit, green leafy vegetables, and β-carotene- and vitamin C-rich fruit and vegetables was associated with a lower CHD risk. Conversely, quantity-adjusted variety was not associated with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that absolute quantity, rather than variety, in fruit and vegetable intake is associated with a significantly lower risk of CHD. Nevertheless, consumption of specific fruit and vegetable subgroups was associated with a lower CHD risk.
Authors: E B Rimm; E L Giovannucci; W C Willett; G A Colditz; A Ascherio; B Rosner; M J Stampfer Journal: Lancet Date: 1991-08-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M J Stampfer; W C Willett; F E Speizer; D C Dysert; R Lipnick; B Rosner; C H Hennekens Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1984-05 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1985-07 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: S Salvini; D J Hunter; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; B Rosner; W C Willett Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 1989-12 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Luc Djoussé; Donna K Arnett; Hilary Coon; Michael A Province; Lynn L Moore; R Curtis Ellison Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lenny M W Nahar-van Venrooij; Esha Marhe; Christel Antonius-Smits; Ingrid S Krishnadath Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2018-08-04 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Yu-Han Chiu; Helena Sandoval-Insausti; Sylvia H Ley; Shilpa N Bhupathiraju; Russ Hauser; Eric B Rimm; JoAnn E Manson; Qi Sun; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Yanping Li; Adela Hruby; Adam M Bernstein; Sylvia H Ley; Dong D Wang; Stephanie E Chiuve; Laura Sampson; Kathryn M Rexrode; Eric B Rimm; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jennifer C Sanchez-Flack; Cheryl A M Anderson; Elva M Arredondo; George Belch; Maria Elena Martinez; Guadalupe X Ayala Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2018-07-19
Authors: Margarethe E Goetz; Suzanne E Judd; Monika M Safford; Terryl J Hartman; William M McClellan; Viola Vaccarino Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 7.045