Literature DB >> 30854363

Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.

Haley F M Augustine1, Jiayi Hu1, Zainab Najarali2, Matthew McRae1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) is a robust, high-quality surgical outcomes database that measures risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of surgical interventions. The purpose of this scoping review is to describe how the NSQIP is being used in plastic surgery research.
METHODS: A comprehensive electronic literature search was completed in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL. Two reviewers independently reviewed articles to determine their relevance using predefined inclusion criteria. Articles were included if they utilized NSQIP data to conduct research in a domain of plastic surgery or analyzed surgical procedures completed by plastic surgeons. Extracted information included the domain of plastic surgery, country of origin, journal, and year of publication.
RESULTS: A total of 106 articles met the inclusion criteria. The most common domain of plastic surgery was breast reconstruction representing 35% of the articles. Of the 106 articles, 95% were published within the last 5 years. The Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery journal published most of the (59%) NSQIP-related articles. All of the studies were retrospective. Of note, there were no articles on burns and only one study on trauma as the domain of plastic surgery.
CONCLUSION: This scoping review describes how NSQIP data are being used to analyze plastic surgery interventions and outcomes in order to guide quality improvement in 106 articles. It demonstrates the utility of NSQIP in the literature, however also identifies some limitations of the program as it applies to plastic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; plastic surgery research; quality improvement; scoping review

Year:  2018        PMID: 30854363      PMCID: PMC6399782          DOI: 10.1177/2292550318800499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)        ISSN: 2292-5503            Impact factor:   0.947


  119 in total

1.  An analysis of delayed breast reconstruction outcomes as recorded in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Adeyemi A Ogunleye; Catherine de Blacam; Michael S Curtis; Salih Colakoglu; Adam M Tobias; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  The outcomes of outcome studies in plastic surgery: a systematic review of 17 years of plastic surgery research.

Authors:  Erika Davis Sears; Patricia B Burns; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; David M Shahian; Justin B Dimick; Samuel R G Finlayson; David R Flum; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce Lee Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.

Authors:  Bruce L Hall; Barton H Hamilton; Karen Richards; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Plastic Surgery Classics: characteristics of 50 top-cited articles in four Plastic Surgery Journals since 1946.

Authors:  Martijn P J Loonen; J Joris Hage; Moshe Kon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on wound complications after breast surgery.

Authors:  Marquita R Decker; David Y Greenblatt; Jeff Havlena; Lee G Wilke; Caprice C Greenberg; Heather B Neuman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Outcomes from treatment of necrotizing soft-tissue infections: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Megan K Mills; Iris Faraklas; Cherisse Davis; Gregory J Stoddard; Jeffrey Saffle
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.

Authors:  Steven M Steinberg; Michael R Popa; Judith A Michalek; Matthew J Bethel; E Christopher Ellison
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  The power of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program--achieving a zero pneumonia rate in general surgery patients.

Authors:  Pascal R Fuchshuber; William Greif; Chantal R Tidwell; Michael S Klemm; Cheryl Frydel; Abdul Wali; Efren Rosas; Molly P Clopp
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2012
View more
  2 in total

1.  A Comparison of Common Plastic Surgery Operations Using the NSQIP and TOPS Databases.

Authors:  Jacob Veith; Willem Collier; Andrew Simpson; David Magno-Padron; Bruce Mast; Robert X Murphy; Jayant Agarwal; Alvin Kwok
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-27

2.  An Ounce of Prediction is Worth a Pound of Cure: Risk Calculators in Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas C Oleck; Sonali Biswas; Ronnie L Shammas; Hani I Naga; Brett T Phillips
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-05-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.