Clara Nan-Hi Lee1, Peter Anthony Ubel, Allison M Deal, Lillian Burdick Blizard, Karen R Sepucha, David W Ollila, Michael Patrick Pignone. 1. *Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC†Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC‡Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC§Department of Marketing, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC¶Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Biostatistics Core Facility, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC||Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA**Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA††Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA‡‡Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess how informed patients are about breast reconstruction, and how involved they are in decision making. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Breast reconstruction is an important treatment option for patients undergoing mastectomy. Wide variations in who gets reconstruction, however, have led to concerns about decision making. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of patients planning mastectomy at a single site, over 20 months. Before surgery, patients completed a survey with validated scales to assess knowledge about breast reconstruction and involvement in decision making. Factors associated with knowledge were examined in a multivariable linear regression model. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients enrolled (77% enrollment rate), and 126 remained eligible. The overall knowledge score was 58.5% (out of 100%). Knowledge about risk of complications was especially low at 14.3%. Knowledge did not differ by treatment (reconstruction or not). On multivariable analysis, non-white race was independently associated with lower knowledge. Most patients (92.1%) reported some discussion with a provider about reconstruction, and most (90.4%) reported being asked their preference. More patients reported discussing the advantages of reconstruction (57.9%) than the disadvantages (27.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing mastectomy in this sample were highly involved in decision making, but had major deficits in knowledge about the procedure. Knowledge about the risk of complications was particularly low. Providers seemed to have discussed the advantages of reconstruction more than its disadvantages.
OBJECTIVE: To assess how informed patients are about breast reconstruction, and how involved they are in decision making. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Breast reconstruction is an important treatment option for patients undergoing mastectomy. Wide variations in who gets reconstruction, however, have led to concerns about decision making. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of patients planning mastectomy at a single site, over 20 months. Before surgery, patients completed a survey with validated scales to assess knowledge about breast reconstruction and involvement in decision making. Factors associated with knowledge were examined in a multivariable linear regression model. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients enrolled (77% enrollment rate), and 126 remained eligible. The overall knowledge score was 58.5% (out of 100%). Knowledge about risk of complications was especially low at 14.3%. Knowledge did not differ by treatment (reconstruction or not). On multivariable analysis, non-white race was independently associated with lower knowledge. Most patients (92.1%) reported some discussion with a provider about reconstruction, and most (90.4%) reported being asked their preference. More patients reported discussing the advantages of reconstruction (57.9%) than the disadvantages (27.8%). CONCLUSIONS:Women undergoing mastectomy in this sample were highly involved in decision making, but had major deficits in knowledge about the procedure. Knowledge about the risk of complications was particularly low. Providers seemed to have discussed the advantages of reconstruction more than its disadvantages.
Authors: Caprice K Christian; Joyce Niland; Stephen B Edge; Rebecca A Ottesen; Melissa E Hughes; Richard Theriault; John Wilson; Charles A Hergrueter; Jane C Weeks Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Catherine L Chen; Andrew D Shore; Roger Johns; Jeanne M Clark; Michele Manahan; Martin A Makary Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Claudia R Albornoz; Peter B Bach; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Khang T Nguyen; Philip J Hanwright; John T Smetona; Elliot M Hirsch; Akhil K Seth; John Y S Kim Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: Adeyiza O Momoh; Raouf Ahmed; Brian P Kelley; Oluseyi Aliu; Kelley M Kidwell; Jeffrey H Kozlow; Kevin C Chung Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Paulina Bajonero-Canonico; Ana S Ferrigno; Jorge A Saldaña-Rodriguez; David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez; Cristel G de la O-Maldonado; Carlos de la Cruz-de la Cruz; Brizio Moreno-Jaime; Mariela Hernandez-Pavon; Jose Moral-de la Rubia; Melina Miaja-Avila; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Clara Nan-Hi Lee; Allison M Deal; Ruth Huh; Peter Anthony Ubel; Yuen-Jong Liu; Lillian Blizard; Caprice Hunt; Michael Patrick Pignone Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Jessica M Hasak; Terence M Myckatyn; Victoria F Grabinski; Sydney E Philpott; Rajiv P Parikh; Mary C Politi Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2017-11-13
Authors: Emerentia Q W Spoon; Kirsten Kortram; Sohal Y Ismail; Daan Nieboer; Frank C H d'Ancona; Maarten H L Christiaans; Ruth E Dam; Hendrik Sijbrand Hofker; Arjan W J Hoksbergen; Karlijn Ami van der Pant; Raechel J Toorop; Jacqueline van de Wetering; Jan N M Ijzermans; Frank J M F Dor Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Justin M Broyles; Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Wangnan Cao; Monika Reddy Bhuma; Shivani Mehta; Laura S Dominici; Andrea L Pusic; Ian J Saldanha Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-03-11
Authors: Clara Nan-Hi Lee; Michael Patrick Pignone; Allison M Deal; Lillian Blizard; Caprice Hunt; Ruth Huh; Yuen-Jong Liu; Peter Anthony Ubel Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 14.766