Katherine B Santosa1, Ji Qi1, Hyungjin M Kim2, Jennifer B Hamill1, Andrea L Pusic3, Edwin G Wilkins4. 1. Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 2. Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 3. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 4. Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: ewilkins@med.umich.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although >40% of new breast cancer diagnoses in the US are in older women, few studies have assessed the outcomes of post-mastectomy reconstruction in this population. Our objective was to evaluate age effects on postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes in women undergoing breast reconstruction, and to investigate whether age effects differ between reconstructive procedure types. STUDY DESIGN: Eligible patients in the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium study from 11 institutions (57 providers) in North America were analyzed. Two-year complications and patient-reported outcomes via BREAST-Q domains were compared across younger (younger than 45 years), middle-aged (45 to 60 years), and older (older than 60 years) women. Mixed-effects regression models were used, controlling for a range of demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: A total of 1,531 patients were studied: 494 younger, 803 middle-aged, and 234 older. Age was not a significant predictor of complications. For sexual well-being 2 years post-reconstruction, older women reported 4.25 (p = 0.04) higher mean scores with implant procedures, and 10.39 (p < 0.01) higher mean scores with autologous procedures compared with younger women. No age effect was seen with implant procedures with regard to physical and psychosocial well-being; however, older women who underwent autologous procedures reported 6.07 (p < 0.01) higher physical, and 8.21 (p < 0.01) higher psychosocial well-being scores than younger women. CONCLUSIONS: Age did not significantly affect complication rates. Older women demonstrated higher sexual well-being for both procedures, and better satisfaction and physical and psychosocial well-being than younger women with autologous procedures. Post-mastectomy reconstruction is a viable option for older patients, with risks and benefits comparable with those in younger women.
BACKGROUND: Although >40% of new breast cancer diagnoses in the US are in older women, few studies have assessed the outcomes of post-mastectomy reconstruction in this population. Our objective was to evaluate age effects on postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes in women undergoing breast reconstruction, and to investigate whether age effects differ between reconstructive procedure types. STUDY DESIGN: Eligible patients in the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium study from 11 institutions (57 providers) in North America were analyzed. Two-year complications and patient-reported outcomes via BREAST-Q domains were compared across younger (younger than 45 years), middle-aged (45 to 60 years), and older (older than 60 years) women. Mixed-effects regression models were used, controlling for a range of demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: A total of 1,531 patients were studied: 494 younger, 803 middle-aged, and 234 older. Age was not a significant predictor of complications. For sexual well-being 2 years post-reconstruction, older women reported 4.25 (p = 0.04) higher mean scores with implant procedures, and 10.39 (p < 0.01) higher mean scores with autologous procedures compared with younger women. No age effect was seen with implant procedures with regard to physical and psychosocial well-being; however, older women who underwent autologous procedures reported 6.07 (p < 0.01) higher physical, and 8.21 (p < 0.01) higher psychosocial well-being scores than younger women. CONCLUSIONS: Age did not significantly affect complication rates. Older women demonstrated higher sexual well-being for both procedures, and better satisfaction and physical and psychosocial well-being than younger women with autologous procedures. Post-mastectomy reconstruction is a viable option for older patients, with risks and benefits comparable with those in younger women.
Authors: Mark Sisco; Donald B Johnson; Chihsiung Wang; Kenneth Rasinski; Veronica L Rundell; Katharine A Yao Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Mazen E Iskandar; Erez Dayan; David Lucido; William Samson; Mark Sultan; Joseph H Dayan; Susan K Boolbol; Mark L Smith Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Stephanie M Wong; Rachel A Freedman; Yasuaki Sagara; Fatih Aydogan; William T Barry; Mehra Golshan Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: John P Fischer; Ari M Wes; Charles T Tuggle; Jonas A Nelson; Julia C Tchou; Joseph M Serletti; Stephen J Kovach; Liza C Wu Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Delphine Héquet; Kevin Zarca; Sylvie Dolbeault; Benoît Couturaud; Charlotte Ngô; Virgine Fourchotte; Anne De La Rochefordière; Jean-Guillaume Féron; Alfred Fitoussi; Catherine Bélichard; Fabien Reyal; Fatima Laki; David Hajage; Brigitte Sigal; Bernard Asselain; Séverine Alran Journal: Springerplus Date: 2013-07-18
Authors: Reshma Jagsi; Adeyiza O Momoh; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Jessica Billig; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Luis Chang-Azancot; Pedro Abizanda; María Gijón; Nitzan Kenig; Manuel Campello; Jessica Juez; Antonio Talaya; Gregorio Gómez-Bajo; Javier Montón; Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Julia H Song; Olga Kantor; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Tari A King; Christina A Minami Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Jessica Erdmann-Sager; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Gretchen E Guldbrandsen; Yoon S Chun Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Louis H Poppler; Minh-Bao Mundschenk; Andrew Linkugel; Ema Zubovic; Utku C Dolen; Terence M Myckatyn Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Oscar J Manrique; Ali Charafeddine; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Joseph Banuelos; Steven R Jacobson; Jorys Martinez-Jorge; Minh-Doan Nguyen; Christin Harless; Nho V Tran; Basel Sharaf; James W Jakub; Tina J Hieken; Amy C Degnim; Judy C Boughey Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 2.430
Authors: Tim C van de Grift; Marc A M Mureau; Vera N Negenborn; Rieky E G Dikmans; Mark-Bram Bouman; Margriet G Mullender Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 3.894