Literature DB >> 26855911

Surgical decision making in conservative mastectomies.

Giuseppe Catanuto1, Nicola Rocco1, Maurizio Bruno Nava1.   

Abstract

We present some clinical advice to drive the decision process in performing conservative mastectomies. Several factors are taken into consideration to indicate these techniques. First of all, we need to identify patients who need a mastectomy due to the extension of the disease. In this case we suggest assessing patients anthropometric characteristics (breast volume-ptosis), and personal preferences regarding the extension of surgical treatment. Small, medium size, without ptosis or with moderate ptosis can be better served by standard nipple-sparing mastectomy. Large and ptotic breast can be removed and reconstructed performing a skin-reducing mastectomy. Mastectomies cannot replace breast conservation and should be discouraged whenever breast-conserving surgery can be performed with good results. However, in some selected cases, and especially in patients with small breast, conservative mastectomies with contralateral reshape can yield favourable results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nipple-sparing mastectomy; breast cancer; oncoplastic breast surgery

Year:  2016        PMID: 26855911      PMCID: PMC4716861          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.05.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  26 in total

1.  George Peters Award. Microscopic anatomy within the nipple: implications for nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Jennifer E Rusby; Elena F Brachtel; Alphonse Taghian; James S Michaelson; Frederick C Koerner; Barbara L Smith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Thomas W Nolan; John Whittington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Skin/nipple sparing mastectomies and implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with large and ptotic breast: oncological and reconstructive results.

Authors:  Maurizio B Nava; Joseph Ottolenghi; Angela Pennati; Andrea Spano; Novella Bruno; Giuseppe Catanuto; Dominik Boliglowa; Valentina Visintini; Stefano Santoro; Secondo Folli
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy: sixty-six months follow-up.

Authors:  F Caruso; M Ferrara; G Castiglione; G Trombetta; L De Meo; G Catanuto; G Carillio
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Risk analysis and stratification of surgical morbidity after immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  John P Fischer; Ari M Wes; Charles T Tuggle; Joseph M Serletti; Liza C Wu
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction and skin-sparing mastectomy - a comparison with patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  H M Heneghan; R S Prichard; R Lyons; P J Regan; J L Kelly; C Malone; R McLaughlin; K J Sweeney; M J Kerin
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Jacobson; D N Danforth; K H Cowan; T d'Angelo; S M Steinberg; L Pierce; M E Lippman; A S Lichter; E Glatstein; P Okunieff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A validated web-based nomogram for predicting positive surgical margins following breast-conserving surgery as a preoperative tool for clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Rick G Pleijhuis; Annemiek B G Kwast; Liesbeth Jansen; Jakob de Vries; Rosanne Lanting; Joost Bart; Theo Wiggers; Gooitzen M van Dam; Sabine Siesling
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease.

Authors:  Eric C Burdge; James Yuen; Matthew Hardee; Pranjali V Gadgil; Chandan Das; Ronda Henry-Tillman; Daniela Ochoa; Soheila Korourian; V Suzanne Klimberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer.

Authors:  D Sarrazin; M G Lê; R Arriagada; G Contesso; F Fontaine; M Spielmann; F Rochard; T Le Chevalier; J Lacour
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  3 in total

1.  Implants Versus Lipograft: Analysis of Long-Term Results Following Congenital Breast Asymmetry Correction.

Authors:  Vanessa Brébant; Maximilian Weiherer; Vivien Noisser; Stephan Seitz; Lukas Prantl; Andreas Eigenberger
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 2.  How to optimize aesthetic outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Maurizio Bruno Nava; Giuseppe Catanuto; Nicola Rocco
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-10

3.  Improved Outcomes with Pedicled Nipple-sparing Mastectomies Using a New Surgical Delay: Mastectomy through Wise Incisions.

Authors:  Jean-Claude D Schwartz; Piotr P Skowronksi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-03-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.