Literature DB >> 24061972

Failures and revisions in surgery for sagittal imbalance: analysis of factors influencing failure.

P Berjano1, R Bassani, G Casero, A Sinigaglia, R Cecchinato, C Lamartina.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sagittal imbalance is an important risk factor for spinal disability, pain and loss of health related quality of life. Its correction has a positive impact on these outcomes. Still, it is a very aggressive surgery, with a high revision rate. The aim of this study is to analyze the most important causes of failure of surgery for correction of sagittal imbalance. DESIGN AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational cohort study twelve patients who previously underwent surgery for sagittal imbalance correction were revised in the period 2009-10. We analyzed angular parameters of sagittal balance before and after primary surgery, type of instrumentation, modality of fusion, implant density, instrumented levels, modality of failure, time from first surgery and angular parameters after revision. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Causes of failure were insufficient correction, junctional kyphosis, screw loosening and pseudoarthrosis with rod breakage. In every case, patients presented a new onset or a worsening of sagittal imbalance and pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24061972      PMCID: PMC3830040          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3024-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  11 in total

Review 1.  Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spinal deformity.

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A method for calculating the exact angle required during pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal deformity: comparison with the trigonometric method.

Authors:  Benson P Yang; Stephen L Ondra
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance of multiple etiologies: a retrospective review of 140 patients.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jung-Hee Lee; Bi-O Jeong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Sigurd Berven; Keith Bridwell; William Horton; John R Dimar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Charles A Sansur; William F Donaldson; Joseph H Perra; Ram Mudiyam; Theodore J Choma; Reinhard D Zeller; D Raymond Knapp; Hilali H Noordeen; Sigurd H Berven; Michael J Goytan; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients : a long-term follow-up data.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Seung-Chul Rhim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-02-28

Review 7.  Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Pedro Berjano; Mary Petruzzi; Aldo Sinigaglia; Giovanni Casero; Riccardo Cecchinato; Marco Damilano; Roberto Bassani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Management of flatback and related kyphotic decompensation syndromes.

Authors:  J P Farcy; F J Schwab
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance).

Authors:  K C Booth; K H Bridwell; L G Lenke; C R Baldus; K M Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The effect of Harrington rod contouring on lumbar lordosis.

Authors:  M P Casey; M A Asher; R R Jacobs; J M Orrick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  30 in total

1.  A novel technique for sublaminar-band-assisted closure of pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Lorenzo Cucciati; Marco Damilano; Matteo Pejrona; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Minimally invasive two-column correction of T10-L5 three-dimensional spinal deformity.

Authors:  William D Smith; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanical in vitro comparison between anterior column realignment and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe sagittal imbalance correction.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Supplementary delta-rod configurations provide superior stiffness and reduced rod stress compared to traditional multiple-rod configurations after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element study.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Ming Xu; Marco Damilano; Thomas Scholl; Claudio Lamartina; Michael Jekir; Fabio Galbusera
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Thoracolumbar osteotomies.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Klaus J Schnake; Maryem Ismael; Patrick Tropiano; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs.

Authors:  Andrea Luca; Claudia Ottardi; Maurizio Sasso; Liliana Prosdocimo; Luigi La Barbera; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Fabio Galbusera; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Revision surgery for implant failure after PSO.

Authors:  Marco Brayda-Bruno; Andrea Luca; Franco Gobetti; Alessio Lovi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Revision surgery after PSO failure with rod breakage: a comparison of different techniques.

Authors:  A Luca; A Lovi; F Galbusera; M Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) in the lumbar spine for sagittal deformities.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.