Literature DB >> 17041517

A method for calculating the exact angle required during pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal deformity: comparison with the trigonometric method.

Benson P Yang1, Stephen L Ondra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) has emerged as a powerful procedure for correcting fixed sagittal deformity. There has only been one attempt to quantify the magnitude of correction needed to restore sagittal balance; the trigonometric method for calculating the desired PSO angle is an approximation. We propose a method for calculating the exact angle required for PSO and explore how this angle differs from that obtained via the trigonometric method in illustrative cases.
METHODS: We conducted a mathematical analysis of the spine with application in illustrative cases. The trigonometric method calculates the necessary angular correction at the axial level of the PSO, but along the sacral vertical line. However, the angular measurement should take place at the true axis of rotation, the apex of the PSO. Measurements were taken from full-length standing x-rays, and both methods were explored.
RESULTS: The trigonometric method for calculating PSO angle is an exact measurement only if the apex of the PSO site lies on the sacral vertical line. As the apex of the PSO site moves anterior to that line, the trigonometric approximation underestimates the actual angle. As the apex of the PSO moves posterior to that line, the trigonometric approximation overestimates the actual angle.
CONCLUSION: The trigonometric method for calculating the PSO angle required for surgical deformity correction is an approximation, but its validity in clinical practice was confirmed by this study. The exact angle is obtained by a method centered on the apex of the PSO site. Although the difference between these angles is small, it is an important conceptual point for spine surgeons. Measurement of the exact angle is easily performed and should replace the trigonometric method for calculating the required PSO angle when standard digital measurement tools are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17041517     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000232628.46247.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  11 in total

1.  Classification of sagittal imbalance based on spinal alignment and compensatory mechanisms.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Failures and revisions in surgery for sagittal imbalance: analysis of factors influencing failure.

Authors:  P Berjano; R Bassani; G Casero; A Sinigaglia; R Cecchinato; C Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Preoperative calculation of the necessary correction in sagittal imbalance surgery: validation of three predictive methods.

Authors:  P Berjano; R Cecchinato; M Damilano; C Morselli; V Sansone; C Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Pedro Berjano; Mary Petruzzi; Aldo Sinigaglia; Giovanni Casero; Riccardo Cecchinato; Marco Damilano; Roberto Bassani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Computerized preoperative planning for correction of sagittal deformity of the spine.

Authors:  Nicolas Aurouer; Ibrahim Obeid; Olivier Gille; Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  A single posterior approach for multilevel modified vertebral column resection in adults with severe rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis: a retrospective study of 13 cases.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Yonggang Zhang; Xuesong Zhang; Peng Huang; Songhua Xiao; Zheng Wang; Zhengsheng Liu; Baowei Liu; Ning Lu; Keya Mao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Successful correction of sagittal imbalance can be calculated on the basis of pelvic incidence and age.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Francesco Langella; Maryem-Fama Ismael; Marco Damilano; Sergio Scopetta; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Acute reciprocal changes distant from the site of spinal osteotomies affect global postoperative alignment.

Authors:  Eric Klineberg; Frank Schwab; Christopher Ames; Richard Hostin; Shay Bess; Justin S Smith; Munish C Gupta; Oheneba Boachie; Robert A Hart; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Douglas C Burton; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-10-04

10.  Asymmetrical vertebral column decancellation for the management of rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis.

Authors:  Fanqi Hu; Wenhao Hu; Xiaoqing Yang; Chunguo Wang; Kai Song; Guoquan Zheng; Xuesong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.