Literature DB >> 25238797

Revision surgery after PSO failure with rod breakage: a comparison of different techniques.

A Luca1, A Lovi, F Galbusera, M Brayda-Bruno.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Author experience and literature review.
OBJECTIVES: To compare different revision techniques in the treatment of implant failure after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). The complication rate of pedicle subtraction osteotomy is substantially higher than other corrective procedures available for the treatment of spinal sagittal imbalance: in particular, hardware failures and mechanical complications affect this technique and their biomechanical explanation is still purely speculative.
METHODS: The author's experience and the literature regarding the revision techniques for PSO failures are discussed.
RESULTS: In this paper, eight consecutive revision cases due to rod breakage after PSO surgery are reported. In our experience, the main goals are to restore the spinal balance, through a posterior approach (correction and hardware revision and implementation) and to get a solid anterior fusion (both through a traditional anterior approach or minimally invasive transpsoas approach).
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of PSO should be balanced with the high risk of the procedure reported in the literature. Management of revision surgery after PSO may require the addition of anterior column support to maintain correction and reduce complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25238797     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3555-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

Review 1.  Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spinal deformity.

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Asymmetric osteotomy of the spine for coronal imbalance: a technical report.

Authors:  Sathya Thambiraj; Bronek M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Instability and instrumentation failures after a PSO: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Sebastien Charosky; Pierre Moreno; Philippe Maxy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Vertebral osteotomy for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  E Thomasen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Charles A Sansur; William F Donaldson; Joseph H Perra; Ram Mudiyam; Theodore J Choma; Reinhard D Zeller; D Raymond Knapp; Hilali H Noordeen; Sigurd H Berven; Michael J Goytan; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Management of fixed sagittal plane deformity: results of the transpedicular wedge resection osteotomy.

Authors:  S H Berven; V Deviren; J A Smith; A Emami; S S Hu; D S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Major complications in revision adult deformity surgery: risk factors and clinical outcomes with 2- to 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Samuel K Cho; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Jin-Seok Yi; Joshua M Pahys; Lukas P Zebala; Matthew M Kang; Woojin Cho; Christine R Baldus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; Christine Baldus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell; Stephen J Lewis; Charles Edwards; Lawrence G Lenke; Theresa M Iffrig; Annette Berra; Christine Baldus; Kathy Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames; Jason Demakakos; Kai-Ming G Fu; Sassan Keshavarzi; Carol M Y Li; Vedat Deviren; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Shay Bess
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  12 in total

1.  Safety and efficacy of osteotomies in adult spinal deformity: what happens in the first year?

Authors:  Selim Ayhan; Bilal Aykac; Selcen Yuksel; Umit Ozgur Guler; Ferran Pellise; Ahmet Alanay; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez-Grueso; Emre Acaroglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical in vitro comparison between anterior column realignment and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe sagittal imbalance correction.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Anterior support reduces the stresses on the posterior instrumentation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite-element study.

Authors:  Andrea Luca; Claudia Ottardi; Alessio Lovi; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Tomaso Villa; Fabio Galbusera
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs.

Authors:  Andrea Luca; Claudia Ottardi; Maurizio Sasso; Liliana Prosdocimo; Luigi La Barbera; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Fabio Galbusera; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Utility of the pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of sagittal spine imbalance.

Authors:  Iulian Popa; Manuel Oprea; Diana Andrei; Peter Mercedesz; Mihai Mardare; Dan V Poenaru
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Peak timing for complications after spine surgery].

Authors:  W Pepke; C Wantia; H Almansour; T Bruckner; M Thielen; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Risk factors for the development of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Guillaume Baucher; Jelena Taskovic; Lucas Troude; Granit Molliqaj; Aria Nouri; Enrico Tessitore
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Hypercomplex pedicle subtraction osteotomies: definition, early clinical and radiological results and complications.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Andrea Zanirato; Domenico Compagnone; Andrea Redaelli; Marco Damilano; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  [Pseudarthrosis and construct failure after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy : Influence of biomechanics, surgical technique, biology and avoidance strategies].

Authors:  C Birkenmaier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Biomechanical advantages of supplemental accessory and satellite rods with and without interbody cages implantation for the stabilization of pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.