J P Farcy1, F J Schwab. 1. Spine Service, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: The authors, in this retrospective study, examined a group of patients with flatback syndrome and a related kyphotic decompensation syndrome. Results of nonrealignment treatment as well as revision surgery with sagittal realignment were reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To determine effectiveness of physical therapy and limited surgical (instrumentation removal) as well as major realignment surgical treatment in the sagittally malaligned spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Flatback is a sagittal plane deformity associated with distraction instrumentation for scoliosis correction. Kyphotic decompensation syndrome involves malaligned fusions from the sacrum for disease other than scoliosis. Several studies describe surgical realignment for flatback involving instrumentation systems no longer commonly applied. Guidelines for a systematic approach to flatback and kyphotic decompensation syndromes are lacking. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with flatback and kyphotic decompensation syndromes were reviewed. Treatment groups were defined by treatment approach and level of previous fusion. Effectiveness of treatment was reviewed in terms of radiographic sagittal alignment and self-reported pain. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated without realignment revision surgery. Twenty-eight patients were treated with anterior and posterior osteotomies and realignment with instrumentation. For patients originally fused to the sacrum, realignment averaged 12 cm. Pain was reduced from 7 to 3 (10-point scale). In patients fused to L4 or L5, realignment averaged 7 cm. Pain was reduced from 6 to 2. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed viable caudal discs in four patients who were consequently spared extension of fusion to the sacrum. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment without realignment surgery demonstrated long-term success in 27% of cases. The latter all had two intact discs below the previous fusion and sagittal malalignment less than 4 cm. Realignment surgery effectively reduced pain in patients failing a conservative approach.
STUDY DESIGN: The authors, in this retrospective study, examined a group of patients with flatback syndrome and a related kyphotic decompensation syndrome. Results of nonrealignment treatment as well as revision surgery with sagittal realignment were reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To determine effectiveness of physical therapy and limited surgical (instrumentation removal) as well as major realignment surgical treatment in the sagittally malaligned spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Flatback is a sagittal plane deformity associated with distraction instrumentation for scoliosis correction. Kyphotic decompensation syndrome involves malaligned fusions from the sacrum for disease other than scoliosis. Several studies describe surgical realignment for flatback involving instrumentation systems no longer commonly applied. Guidelines for a systematic approach to flatback and kyphotic decompensation syndromes are lacking. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with flatback and kyphotic decompensation syndromes were reviewed. Treatment groups were defined by treatment approach and level of previous fusion. Effectiveness of treatment was reviewed in terms of radiographic sagittal alignment and self-reported pain. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated without realignment revision surgery. Twenty-eight patients were treated with anterior and posterior osteotomies and realignment with instrumentation. For patients originally fused to the sacrum, realignment averaged 12 cm. Pain was reduced from 7 to 3 (10-point scale). In patients fused to L4 or L5, realignment averaged 7 cm. Pain was reduced from 6 to 2. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed viable caudal discs in four patients who were consequently spared extension of fusion to the sacrum. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment without realignment surgery demonstrated long-term success in 27% of cases. The latter all had two intact discs below the previous fusion and sagittal malalignment less than 4 cm. Realignment surgery effectively reduced pain in patients failing a conservative approach.
Authors: Kristen E Radcliff; Fabio Orozco; Nicholas Molby; Lawrence Delasotta; Eric Chen; Zachary Post; Alvin Ong Journal: Orthop Surg Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.071
Authors: Miguel Pishnamaz; Matti Scholz; Per D Trobisch; Philipp Lichte; Christian Herren; Frank Hildebrand; Philipp Kobbe Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Whoan Jeang Kim; Jong Won Kang; Sung Il Kang; Hwan Il Sung; Kun Young Park; Jae Guk Park; Won Cho Kwon; Won Sik Choy Journal: Asian Spine J Date: 2010-04-26